Broccoli
This is a component library of all basic and common components across all
bloomreach project apps. This will be primarily primitive components and
possibly some specialized items as well.
Viewing Available Components
Visit the library storybook to view the latest available components.
Using library in a project
Install the following libraries to the project dependencies
npm i --save --save-exact @bloomreach/broccoli @bloomreach/banana-theme
Note:
The library @bloomreach/banana-theme
is required only to bring fonts used by default in the global design system which is going to be used across all Bloomreach applications.
Using it as a separate dependency in the end application is a temporary solution and will be changed in the near future by hiding inside @bloomreach/broccoli
library.
Components
In case project settings are properly established, use the components in the application like so
import { <ComponentName> } from "@bloomreach/broccoli";
Styles & Fonts
Do the following steps to make styles and fonts available
-
Import broccoli
styles along with fonts by adding the following lines in the main application style file
// main.scss
@import '@bloomreach/banana-theme/css/fonts.css';
@import '@bloomreach/broccoli/style.css';
...
-
Additionally, set the font-family
property to the root element using CSS custom properties available from the broccoli library
// main.scss
...
html, body {
font-family: var(--broccoli-font-family-primary);
}
...
The full list of available CSS custom properties will be available soon. Now just use the browser dev tools to see all available CSS custom properties. Filter them with the --broccoli-
prefix to reduce the amount.
ATTENTION:
Please, avoid using --banana-...
CSS custom properties as they are intended to be used inside the broccoli
library itself.
Development
Prerequisites
Install all dependencies
npm ci
Run the storybook
npm run start
After that, any changes in the source code will automatically be reflected in the storybook.
Branching types
To manage and automate complex release workflow based on multiple Git branches and distribution channels used the semantic-release
library. Check the documentation for more details. The current setup is reduced and simplified as much as possible, however, it is flexible and might be extended in the future if needed.
The current branch types are explained below.
- The
master
branch - is a permanent branch, where releases happen for the latest versions. All versions from that branch will be published to the npm registry with a latest
dist-tag; - The
next
branch should be used when we want to develop an important feature, which is a breaking change. Considering the scope of this feature we want to make it available, at first, only to a limited amount of users in order to get feedback or run tests. Once we get that feedback we can make improvements and ultimately make the new feature available to all users by merging changes into the master
branch; Releases from the next
branch will be published to the npm registry with a next
dist-tag; - The maintenance branches (i.e.
2.x
to maintain release v2
). The maintenance branch is a type of branch that allows publishing releases with a semantic version on top of the codebase of an old release. This is useful when you need to provide fixes or features to users who cannot upgrade to the last version of the package; - Feature branches (like
feature/BR-XX-my-awesome-feature
, fix/BR-XX-that-is-life
) or any other kind of branch to commit small units of work that do not produce releases (until merged into one of the branches above). These branches are ignored from now on as they don’t have to trigger releases;
The following changes should be done to change or extend the current setup:
- Add a new release/maintenance/pre-release branch to the
semantic-release
configuration in ./.releaserc
, check the documentation for more details; - Update the Gitlab pipeline
release
job to allow running it with the new branch, check ./.gitlab-ci.yml
; - Verify that the new branch is marked as
protected
in the repository settings.
Find more examples of possible release workflows in the official semantic-release
documentation.
Commit Message Format
To have an automated release process the git commit messages must follow the following format.
This specification following Conventional Commits. It provides an easy set of rules for creating an explicit commit history. This convention dovetails with semantic version, by describing the features, fixes, and breaking changes made in commit messages.
Each commit message consists of a header, a body, and a footer.
<header>
<BLANK LINE>
<body>
<BLANK LINE>
<footer>
The header
is mandatory and must conform to the Commit Message Header format.
The body
is optional. When the body is present it must be at least 20 characters long and must conform to the Commit Message Body format.
The footer
is optional. The Commit Message Footer format describes what the footer is used for and the structure it must have.
The commit contains the following structural elements:
fix
: a commit of the type fix patches a bug in your codebase (this correlates with PATCH
in Semantic Versioning).feat
: a commit of the type feat introduces a new feature to the codebase (this correlates with MINOR
in Semantic Versioning).BREAKING CHANGE
: a commit that has a footer BREAKING CHANGE:, or appends a !
after the type/scope
, introduces a breaking API change (correlating with MAJOR
in Semantic Versioning). A BREAKING CHANGE can be part of commits of any type.- types other than
fix
: and feat
: are allowed, see types. - footers other than BREAKING CHANGE: may be provided and follow a convention similar to git trailer format.
Additional types are not mandated by the Conventional Commits specification, and have no implicit effect in Semantic Versioning (unless they include a BREAKING CHANGE).
<type>(<scope>): <short summary>
│ │ │
│ │ └─⫸ Summary in present tense. Not capitalized. No period at the end.
│ │
│ └─⫸ Commit Scope: Right now not used but will be expanded in the near future.
│
└─⫸ Commit Type: build|chore|ci|docs|feat|feature|fix|perf|refactor|style|test.
The <type>
and <summary>
fields are mandatory, the (<scope>)
field is optional and not used now.
Type
Must be one of the following:
build
- changes that affect the build system or external dependencies; Hidden from the release notes;chore
- changes which are not fit to the rest of the types. Hidden from the release notes;ci
- changes to our CI configuration files and scripts. Hidden from the release notes;docs
- documentation only changes. Hidden from the release notes;feat
- a new feature. Appeared in the release notes under section Features
;feature
- the alias for the typefeat
;fix
- a bug fix. Appeared in the release notes under section Bug Fixes
;perf
- a code change that improves performance. Appeared in the release notes under section Performance Improvements
;refactor
- a code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature. Hidden from the release notes;revert
- revert of the previous changes. Appeared in the release notes under section Reverts
;style
- changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc). Hidden from the release notes;test
- adding missing tests or correcting existing tests. Hidden from the release notes.
If the prefix is feat
, fix
, perf
or revert
, it will appear in the release notes. However if there is any BREAKING CHANGE, the commit will always appear in the changelog.
Other prefixes are up to your discretion. Suggested prefixes are build
, ci
, docs
,style
, refactor
, style
, test
and chore
for non-changelog related tasks.
Scope
Not used currently.
Summary
Use the summary field to provide a succinct description of the change:
- use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes"
- don't capitalize the first letter
- no dot (.) at the end
Commit Message Body
Just as in the summary, use the imperative, present tense: "fix" not "fixed" nor "fixes".
Explain the motivation for the change in the commit message body. This commit message should explain why you are making the change. You can include a comparison of the previous behavior with the new behavior in order to illustrate the impact of the change.
The footer can contain information about breaking changes and is also the place to reference Jira tickets, and other MRs that this commit closes or is related to.
For example:
BREAKING CHANGE: <breaking change summary>
<BLANK LINE>
<breaking change description + migration instructions>
<BLANK LINE>
<BLANK LINE>
<Closes|Fixes> BR-<issue number>
Breaking Change section should start with the phrase BREAKING CHANGE: followed by a summary of the breaking change, a blank line, and a detailed description of the breaking change that also includes migration instructions.
Similarly, a Deprecation section should start with DEPRECATED: followed by a short description of what is deprecated, a blank line, and a detailed description of the deprecation that also mentions the recommended update path.
Revert commits
If the commit reverts a previous commit, it should begin with revert:
, followed by the header of the reverted commit.
The content of the commit message body should contain:
- information about the SHA of the commit being reverted in the following format:
This reverts commit <SHA>
, - a clear description of the reason for reverting the commit message.
Storybook
The Storybook is used to develop and view components in isolation. The storybook files should end with *.stories.tsx
and be placed close to the component or module which is going to be documented for all new or rewritten components. The ./stories
folder should locate only generic information about the library itself and additionally, complex stories involving multiple components.
The old components stories are located in the ./stories
folder. They are going to be removed soon. In case the new implementation is ready but the old one is still available to prevent breaking changes, please, mark the old stories as DEPRECATED to group them, see for example: ./stories/components/buttons
.
Autogen
Icons
The icon files and exports are auto-generated using the script at scripts/gen-icons
. If new icons are added in the banana-theme project, run this script to regenerate the icon exports
Testing
When adding changes for any component part of the library it is mandatory to have them covered by tests. These tests need to be meaningful and developed with extensive coverage in mind. By their nature components will be used in a wide variety of scenarios and so extensive coverage is crucial in order to avoid unpredictable results.
The library is developed with a two-level testing approach in mind like unit tests and E2E tests. Each component should have unit tests and E2E tests. The unit tests should cover the component logic and the E2E tests should cover the component behavior in the real browser environment together with visual regression testing.
Unit tests
The Vitest unit test framework is used for the unit testing. The unit test files should end with *.spec.ts(x)
and place close to the component or module which is going to be tested.
End-to-end tests
The Playwright test framework is used for end-to-end testing. All tests are located in the component or module folder and should end with *.test.ts(x)
. The e2e tests run against special storybook stories which contain different scenarios for the test component.
The stories for the e2e test should be located in the same place as tests and component stories and end with *.qa.stories.ts(x)
. The title of test stories should contain QA
at the end and look something like this: <Component Group>/<Component Name>/QA
. The e2e stories should be used only for e2e tests and not for documentation purposes. The e2e stories should reuse the component stories metadata and base stories as much as possible but at the same time, they should give flexibility to test different scenarios.
The purpose of using the e2e tests is to eliminate any manual QA work and provide high-quality components to the end-users. In that case, each component should be covered with e2e tests and visual regression tests and have comprehensive coverage based on the different scenarios and component states. The downside of this comprehensive approach is that the e2e tests are slow and take time to run and increasing the number of tests will increase the time to run them. So, please, be aware of that and try to find a balance between the number of tests and the time to run them but always keep in mind that the quality of the components is the most important thing and CI tome always might be improved, optimized etc.
Run e2e tests
- Use the command
npm run e2e
to start end-to-end tests inside the Docker container (the docker
and docker compose
should be installed on your machine). - When tests are done check the Playwright output in the console if some of the tests failed use the following command to open the Playwright report:
npm run e2e:report
Update failed visual regression tests
- If the failure appeared in the visual regression tests and those changes are correct, please update the existing reference images with the following command:
npm run e2e:update
. The Playwright will generate new correct reference images which should be committed to the repository
The e2e tests configuration for CI and local development
All e2e tests run locally in Docker container based on the official image, see Playwright documentation for more details. Tests run inside the Docker container to keep a predictable environment for each developers and CI.
CI setup its own job based on the same Docker image and almost repeat the same commands as it done in docker-compose.yml
file.
IMPORTANT
Please, be aware that in case of any changes in the CI setup for the e2e tests
job, see .gitlab-ci.yml
they should be applied to the local setup in the docker-compose.yml
and vice-versa.
Releasing
The release of the new version is going to be done automatically when the changes reach one of the release branches and commit messages contain one of the structural elements.
To preview the possible release version and release notes based on already existing commits run the following command
npm run release:dry-run
The Gitlab pipeline runs all the checks and if the library is in good order:
- The release notes will be updated according commit messages history;
- The library version will be bumped;
- The new commit will be created with a version and changed release notes;
- The new git tag will be created in the repository;
- The new version of the library will be published to npm;
Only a few manual steps should be done after all: