@henrygd/queue
![JSR Score 100%](https://jsr.io/badges/@henrygd/queue/score)
Tiny async queue with concurrency control. Like p-limit
or fastq
, but smaller and faster. See comparisons and benchmarks below.
Works with:
![This package works with Bun. Bun](https://jsr.io/logos/bun.svg)
Usage
Create a queue with the newQueue
function. Then add async functions - or promise returning functions - to your queue with the add
method.
You can use queue.done()
to wait for the queue to be empty.
import { newQueue } from '@henrygd/queue'
const queue = newQueue(2)
const pokemon = ['ditto', 'hitmonlee', 'pidgeot', 'poliwhirl', 'golem', 'charizard']
for (const name of pokemon) {
queue.add(async () => {
const res = await fetch(`https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon/${name}`)
const json = await res.json()
console.log(`${json.name}: ${json.height * 10}cm | ${json.weight / 10}kg`)
})
}
console.log('running')
await queue.done()
console.log('done')
The return value of queue.add
is the same as the return value of the supplied function.
const response = await queue.add(() => fetch('https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon'))
console.log(response.ok, response.status, response.headers)
[!TIP]
If you need support for Node's AsyncLocalStorage, import @henrygd/queue/async-storage
instead.
Queue interface
queue.add<T>(promiseFunction: () => PromiseLike<T>): Promise<T>
queue.done(): Promise<void>
queue.clear(): void
queue.active(): number
queue.size(): number
Comparisons and benchmarks
Library | Version | Bundle size (B) | Weekly downloads |
---|
@henrygd/queue | 1.0.6 | 355 | dozens :) |
p-limit | 5.0.0 | 1,763 | 118,953,973 |
async.queue | 3.2.5 | 6,873 | 53,645,627 |
fastq | 1.17.1 | 3,050 | 39,257,355 |
queue | 7.0.0 | 2,840 | 4,259,101 |
promise-queue | 2.2.5 | 2,200 | 1,092,431 |
Note on benchmarks
All libraries run the exact same test. Each operation measures how quickly the queue can resolve 1,000 async functions. The function just increments a counter and checks if it has reached 1,000.1
We check for completion inside the function so that promise-queue
and p-limit
are not penalized by having to use Promise.all
(they don't provide a promise that resolves when the queue is empty).
Browser benchmark
This test was run in Chromium. Chrome and Edge are the same. Firefox and Safari are slower and closer, with @henrygd/queue
just edging out promise-queue
. I think both are hitting the upper limit of what those browsers will allow.
You can run or tweak for yourself here: https://jsbm.dev/TKyOdie0sbpOh
![@henrygd/queue - 13,665 Ops/s. fastq - 7,661 Ops/s. promise-queue - 7,650 Ops/s. async.queue - 4,060 Ops/s. p-limit - 1,067 Ops/s. queue - 721 Ops/s](https://henrygd-assets.b-cdn.net/queue/106/browser-benchmark.png)
Node.js benchmarks
p-limit
is very slow because it uses AsyncResource.bind
on every run, which is much faster in Bun than in Node or Deno.
Ryzen 5 4500U | 8GB RAM | Node 22.3.0
![@henrygd/queue - 1.9x faster than fastq. 2.03x promise-queue. 3.86x async.queue. 20x queue. 86x p-limit.](https://henrygd-assets.b-cdn.net/queue/106/node-4500.png)
Ryzen 7 6800H | 32GB RAM | Node 22.3.0
![@henrygd/queue - 1.9x faster than fastq. 2.01x promise-queue. 3.98x async.queue. 6.86x queue. 88x p-limit.](https://henrygd-assets.b-cdn.net/queue/106/node-6800h.png)
Deno benchmarks
Ryzen 5 4500U | 8GB RAM | Deno 1.44.4
![@henrygd/queue - 1.9x faster than fastq. 2.01x promise-queue. 4.7x async.queue. 7x queue. 28x p-limit.](https://henrygd-assets.b-cdn.net/queue/106/deno-4500.png)
Ryzen 7 6800H | 32GB RAM | Deno 1.44.4
![@henrygd/queue - 1.82x faster than fastq. 1.91x promise-queue. 3.47x async.queue. 7x queue. 26x p-limit.](https://henrygd-assets.b-cdn.net/queue/106/deno-6800h.png)
Bun benchmarks
Ryzen 5 4500U | 8GB RAM | Bun 1.1.17
![@henrygd/queue - 1.25x faster than promise-queue. 1.66x fastq. 2.73x async.queue. 5.44x p-limit. 12x queue.](https://henrygd-assets.b-cdn.net/queue/106/bun-4500.png)
Ryzen 7 6800H | 32GB RAM | Bun 1.1.17
![@henrygd/queue - 1.17x faster than promise-queue. 1.51x fastq. 2.53x async.queue. 5.25x p-limit. 5.39x queue.](https://henrygd-assets.b-cdn.net/queue/106/bun-6800h.png)
Cloudflare Workers benchmark
Uses oha to make 1,000 requests to each worker. Each request creates a queue and resolves 5,000 functions.
This was run locally using Wrangler on a Ryzen 7 6800H laptop. Wrangler uses the same workerd runtime as workers deployed to Cloudflare, so the relative difference should be accurate. Here's the repository for this benchmark.
Library | Requests/sec | Total (sec) | Average | Slowest |
---|
@henrygd/queue | 816.1074 | 1.2253 | 0.0602 | 0.0864 |
promise-queue | 647.2809 | 1.5449 | 0.0759 | 0.1149 |
fastq | 336.7031 | 3.0877 | 0.1459 | 0.2080 |
async.queue | 198.9986 | 5.0252 | 0.2468 | 0.3544 |
queue | 85.6483 | 11.6757 | 0.5732 | 0.7629 |
p-limit | 77.7434 | 12.8628 | 0.6316 | 0.9585 |
Related
@henrygd/semaphore
- Fastest javascript inline semaphores and mutexes using async / await.
License
MIT license