Research
Security News
Threat Actor Exposes Playbook for Exploiting npm to Build Blockchain-Powered Botnets
A threat actor's playbook for exploiting the npm ecosystem was exposed on the dark web, detailing how to build a blockchain-powered botnet.
@starbeam/renderer
Advanced tools
| Framework | Renderer Status | Spec Compatibility | | --------- | --------------- | ------------------ | | React | _released_ | _next release_ | | Preact | _released_ | _next release_ | | Vue | _next release_ | _next relea
Framework | Renderer Status | Spec Compatibility |
---|---|---|
React | released | next release |
Preact | released | next release |
Vue | next release | next release |
Svelte | designing | - |
Ember | designing | - |
Solid | roadmap | - |
"Spec compatibility" means compatibility with the API design in this document.
These APIs exist in all renderers.
API | Parameter | Returns |
---|---|---|
setupReactive | () => Reactive<T> | Native<T> |
setupResource | IntoResourceBlueprint | Native<T> React1 |
getService | IntoResourceBlueprint | Native<T> |
Native<T>
)Reactive<T>
.T
.setupResource
The setupResource
function takes a resource blueprint and returns a
framework-native reactive value.
getService
The getService
function takes a resource blueprint and gets a service instance
for the current app as a framework-native reactive value.
If the blueprint has already been instantiated for this app, the same instance is returned.
A hook-style component is a function that runs on both initial render and update. In this situation, hooks provided by Starbeam set up resource and services on the initial render. These hooks also return the current value of the resource on all renders.
React and Preact are hook-style renderers. Solid is not.
Hook-style renderers include the core APIs, which return reactive values.
In addition, they include idiomatic hooks that return bare values.
Purpose | Core API | Hook API |
---|---|---|
Reactive | setupReactive(ReactiveBlueprint<T>) => Native<T> | useReactive(ReactiveBlueprint<T>) => T |
Resource | setupResource(ResourceBlueprint<T>) => Native<T> | useResource(ResourceBlueprint<T>) => T |
Service | setupService(ResourceBlueprint<T>) => Native<T> | useService(ResourceBlueprint<T>) => T |
In addition, hook-style renderers include a hook that runs during Starbeam's
setup phase: useInstance
.
function Counter() {
const counter = useResource(Counter);
const localCount = useInstance(() => Cell(0));
// localCount returns the cell instance. The count will
// always be zero after `resource` is initially created
// (i.e. for each setup phase of Counter)
return <>
<p>{counter}</p>
<button
onClick={() => localCount.current++}
>
Increment
</button>
</p>
}
All of these hooks take a dependency array that behave idiomatically.
If the dependencies to useResource
invalidate, the resource will be cleaned up
and reinstantiated. Otherwise, the function passed to the hook will be called
again on the next render.
Applies to renderers that have explicit setup code that runs only once per component.
useReactive()
Note: Preact does not require the useReactive
function, because its
plugin API allows us to automatically track values consumed by each component.
The useReactive
function is called in the setup code of a component. It turns
the component into a reactive component by registering appropriate lifecycle
hooks that allow Starbeam to track all values consumed by the component during
initial render and update.
For a JavaScript value of type T
.
Framework | Reactive Type | Renderer Status |
---|---|---|
React | T | released |
Preact | Signal<T> | released |
Vue | Ref<T> | next release |
Svelte | Store<T> | designing |
Ember | Reactive<T> | designing |
Solid | Signal<T> | roadmap |
You can think of the component phases as a universal lifecycle for components in all supported frameworks.
This universal lifecycle is not a lowest-common denominator subset. Instead,
it aims to support a universal API that is rich enough to support advanced
features in supported frameworks (such as Vue's KeepAlive
) while avoiding
gratuitous differences that make it difficult to write universal frontend code.
These phases are meaningful in all supported frameworks and idiomatic usage of Starbeam's universal APIs will interact with them.
Phase | Purpose |
---|---|
Setup | The component's setup code is run once per component. |
Rendering | This code is run after the setup phase and has access to the state created in the setup phase. |
Before Paint | This phase is no earlier than the resource setup phase and no later than browser paint. Code that runs in this phase block the browser's painting process. |
Rendered | This phase is after the Before Paint phase and after the browser paint. If the cleanup phase happens quickly, the Rendered phase may not happen at all. |
Cleanup | The final phase of a component's lifecycle. During this phase, any registered cleanup handlers are evaluated. |
These phases are supported by Starbeam's universal APIs, but are equivalent to one of the primary phases in most frameworks.
Phase | Purpose | Framework(s) |
---|---|---|
Resource Setup | This phase is guaranteed to be paired with a future cleanup phase. This phase happens after rendering in React. In all other frameworks, Setup is guaranteed to be paired with a future cleanup phase. | React |
Deactivate | A component is removed from the tree with the possibility of returning in the future. Deactivate must be followed by Reactivate or Cleanup. | Vue |
Reactivate | A component that was previously deactivated is restored. | Vue |
In Starbeam, a component's lifetime starts with the component's setup phase and ends when the component's cleanup phase.
Because React has interesting deactivation behavior, make sure to read React's Component Lifetime and Lifecycle appendix for the full scoop.
In most frameworks, there is a single cleanup phase that runs exactly once for each time a component is instantiated and rendered.
This is not always exactly true:
In practice, this means that resources that register cleanup handlers are cleaned up when the component is cleaned up.
These handlers may run multiple times during a single React component instance, which aligns with React's lifecycle design.
During the evaluation of setup code, a stable value that represents the current application instance.
An application instance has a 1:1 correspondence with the root component of a render tree.
Frameworks don't typically expose something like this directly, but it's reasonably easy to synthesize with features like "context" or by requiring the user to install a framework plugin.
In practice, this means that most renderers require the user to use a context
provider component or install a plugin in order to use the service
feature.
Renderer | Type |
---|---|
React | Hook-Style |
Preact | Hook-Style |
Solid | Instance-Style |
Vue | Instance-Style |
Svelte | Instance-Style |
Ember | Instance-Style |
A hook-style API is a function that runs on both initial render and update.
In these frameworks, there is no separation between the code that runs on initial render and the code that runs on update, but the primitive hooks supplied by the framework provide tools that you can use to implement behavior that only runs on initial render.
An instance-style API is an API that has explicit setup code that runs only once per component. These APIs also have some sort of render function that runs on each render (both initial render and udpate), and this code has access to the values created during setup.
Some instance-style frameworks, such as Solid, attempt to use an API style that mimics hook-style APIs. Others, such as Ember, primarily use JavaScript classes to distinguish between setup code and rendering. Still others, such as Vue, draw a strong distinction between setup code and rendering using framework-specific API patterns.
In addition, instance-style frameworks can support render functions (Solid), templates (Ember, Svelte), or a mix of both (Vue).
While these distinctions can make these APIs seem very different from each other, they are fundamental very similar:
All instance-style frameworks expose an explicit place to run setup code and a separate way to express render logic. The setup code runs only once per component, and the state that it sets up is accessible to the render logic.
Renderer | Setup API | Hook API |
---|---|---|
React | setupResource() => Reactive<T> | useResource() => T |
Preact | setupResource() => Signal<T> | useResource() => T |
Solid | setupResource() => Signal<T> | N/A |
Vue | setupResource() => Ref<T> | N/A |
Svelte | setupResource() => ReadonlyStore<T> | N/A |
Ember | setupResource() => Reactive<T> | N/A |
Renderer | Setup API | Hook API |
---|---|---|
React | getService() => Reactive<T> | useService() => T |
Preact | getService() => Signal<T> | useService() => T |
Solid | getService() => Signal<T> | N/A |
Vue | getService() => Ref<T> | N/A |
Svelte | getService() => ReadonlyStore<T> | N/A |
Ember | getService() => Reactive<T> | N/A |
Since React calls cleanup callbacks multiple times, you might have expected React to support deactivation and reactivation phases.
However, remember that "Deactivate must be followed by Reactivate or Cleanup". While React runs cleanup callbacks multiple times, each run might be the last one.
- Mounting
- When React calls a component's render function for the first time, we say that the component is "mounting".
- Unmounting
- When React calls
useEffect
anduseLayoutEffect
cleanup callbacks, even when the dependency array hasn't changed, we say that the component is "unmounting".- Remounting
- When React calls
useEffect
anduseLayoutEffect
again, even when the dependency array hasn't changed, we say that the component is "remounting".
Each time React unmounts a component, its cleanup phase runs. If React remounts the same component, its setup phase runs again.
From the perspective of Starbeam's lifecycle, a component's lifetime starts when a component is mounting or remounting and ends when a component is unmounting.
A single React component can have multiple Starbeam lifetimes.
Most users will encounter this when using React strict mode. Because Starbeam is
going with the React grain and cleaning up resources when a component is
unmounted, setupResource
and useResource
work transparently in React strict mode.
In other frameworks, the Setup Phase is guaranteed to be paired with a future cleanup phase.
However, React's Setup Phase may run multiple times before a cleanup phase is run, or a cleanup phase may not run at all.
As a result, Starbeam resources cannot be instantiated until React's special Resource Setup Phase.
In practice, this means that resources are undefined
during the initial render
of a React component. If undefined
is not desirable, React's setupResource
has an initial
option that you can use to specify what the initial value of
the resource should be during initial render.
Note that this is a fundamental consequence of React's decision to disallow render functions from registering cleanup handlers at the top level.
In React, there is no meaningful distinction between the cleanup phase and the deactivate phase. When React calls cleanup callbacks, it is impossible to determine whether the component is eligible for reactivation in the future. Components that are never reactivated don't receive any future cleanup callbacks, so cleanup code has to fully clean up the component.
In contrast, Vue calls onDeactivated
callbacks when the component is
deactivated, but not onUnmounted
. If the component is subsequently removed
entirely (and will never be reactivated), Vue calls onUnmounted
at that point.
As a result, the Vue renderer has a meaningful deactivation phase, while the React renderer treats deactivation and unmounting as equivalent.
This means that deactivation handlers registered in universal Starbeam code will run during Vue deactivation, but React deactivation results in full cleanup.
Unless you have a very specific reason to support a deactivation/unmount distinction in universal code, you should register cleanup handlers and not worry about deactivation handlers.
In React, each time a component is reactivated, it gets a new component lifetime. This means that setup handlers run again, and any per-instance state is reinitialized.
Unlike Vue, this hook cannot be used to persist resources (because we we can't differentiate between deactivations and final unmounting), but it may be useful to support persisting in-memory state on an opt-in basis.
From a usage perspective, this means that resources get cleaned up when a component is unmounted or deactivated in React.
This is what React's design wants us to do: React intentionally calls cleanup handlers when a component is deactivated, and intentionally does not give us a way to run cleanup handlers when a deactivated component is finally disposed.
React Strict Mode intentionally calls cleanup handlers during initial render (deactivating the component) and then runs effects again (reactivating the component) to teach users that cleanup might happen multiple times, and every cleanup might be the last one.
React returns Reactive<T | undefined>
from setupResource
(see React Resources). ↩
FAQs
| Framework | Renderer Status | Spec Compatibility | | --------- | --------------- | ------------------ | | React | _released_ | _next release_ | | Preact | _released_ | _next release_ | | Vue | _next release_ | _next relea
We found that @starbeam/renderer demonstrated a not healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released a year ago. It has 2 open source maintainers collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Research
Security News
A threat actor's playbook for exploiting the npm ecosystem was exposed on the dark web, detailing how to build a blockchain-powered botnet.
Security News
NVD’s backlog surpasses 20,000 CVEs as analysis slows and NIST announces new system updates to address ongoing delays.
Security News
Research
A malicious npm package disguised as a WhatsApp client is exploiting authentication flows with a remote kill switch to exfiltrate data and destroy files.