Research
Security News
Malicious npm Packages Inject SSH Backdoors via Typosquatted Libraries
Socket’s threat research team has detected six malicious npm packages typosquatting popular libraries to insert SSH backdoors.
@theledger/fabric-mock-stub
Advanced tools
Mock implementation of the hyperledger fabric-shim package for testing
A Nodejs module that helps you to test your Hyperledger Fabric Nodejs chaincode. When it proves itself, we will be adding this package to the official Gerrit of the Fabric Nodejs SDK.
Fabric node SDK | Mock stub |
---|---|
v1.2.X | v2.X.X |
V1.1.X | v1.3.X |
yarn add @theledger/fabric-mock-stub --dev
fields
and sort
into GetQueryResultThis ChaincodeMockStub is a Mock implementation of the fabric-shim stub. This means you can test your chaincode without actually starting your network.
Examples are located at examples/tests
!! Following methods are not (yet) implemented and will not work !!
Testing NodeJS chaincode works similarly to testing using the mockstub in the Golang chaincode.
The ChaincodeMockStub has 2 important mock functions mockInit
and mockInvoke
. By passing your chaincode, it will mock a transaction and execute a invoke/init similarly to how it will originally be called. Both these functions will return a ChaincodeResponse. Using this ChaincodeResponse object, we can test whether or not the action returned an expected result.
On success, this response will look like this. If the method returns something, the response will also contain a payload
.
{
"status": 200,
"payload": <Buffer_with_your_data>
}
On error, this response will look like this.
{
"status": 500,
"message": <Buffer_with_your_error_message>
}
You'll be able to validate the response using something like chai
.
// Validate response status
expect(response.status).to.eql(200)
// Validate payload - using `Transform.bufferToObject` because we recieve the payload as a buffer
expect(Transform.bufferToObject(response.payload).owner).to.eql("newOwner")
At the top of your test file, you can import and instantiate your chaincode, this only has to be done once.
import { MyChaincode } from '../<path_to_your_chaincode_class>';
// You always need your chaincode so it knows which chaincode to invoke on
const chaincode = new MyChaincode();
After this, in your tests, you can create a new mockstub. You have to pass a random name (not that important) and your chaincode. It's up to you if you want to create a new mockstub for each test, which runs those tests with an empty state. Or use one for all the tests. If you reuse the same stub, you also reuse the previous tests state.
import { ChaincodeMockStub, Transform } from "@theledger/fabric-mock-stub";
const mockStub = new ChaincodeMockStub("MyMockStub", chaincode);
import { MyChaincode } from '../<path_to_your_chaincode_class>';
import { ChaincodeMockStub, Transform } from "@theledger/fabric-mock-stub";
// You always need your chaincode so it knows which chaincode to invoke on
const chaincode = new MyChaincode();
describe('Test MyChaincode', () => {
it("Should init without issues", async () => {
const mockStub = new ChaincodeMockStub("MyMockStub", chaincode);
// Your test code
});
});
The Init()
method can be tested using the mockStub.mockInit(txId: string, args: string[])
function. It will create a new mock transaction and call the init method on your chaincode. Since the init happens when instantiating your chaincode, you generally don't want it to return anything. So, for this, we'll check the response status.
import { MyChaincode } from '../<path_to_your_chaincode_class>';
import { ChaincodeMockStub, Transform } from "@theledger/fabric-mock-stub";
// You always need your chaincode so it knows which chaincode to invoke on
const chaincode = new MyChaincode();
describe('Test MyChaincode', () => {
it("Should init without issues", async () => {
const mockStub = new ChaincodeMockStub("MyMockStub", chaincode);
const response = await mockStub.mockInit("tx1", []);
expect(response.status).to.eql(200)
});
});
The Invoke()
method can be tested using the mockStub.mockInvoke(txId: string, args: string[])
function. It will create a new mock transaction and call the invoke method on your chaincode. The client will either send a query or an invoke, but the chaincode will accept these both as invoke. In your tests there isn't any difference, both invokes and queries can return a result.
Test queryCar
import { MyChaincode } from '../<path_to_your_chaincode_class>';
import { ChaincodeMockStub, Transform } from "@theledger/fabric-mock-stub";
// You always need your chaincode so it knows which chaincode to invoke on
const chaincode = new MyChaincode();
describe('Test MyChaincode', () => {
it("Should query car", async () => {
const mockStub = new ChaincodeMockStub("MyMockStub", chaincode);
const response = await mockStub.mockInvoke("tx2", ['queryCar', `CAR0`]);
expect(Transform.bufferToObject(response.payload)).to.deep.eq({
'make': 'prop1',
'model': 'prop2',
'color': 'prop3',
'owner': 'owner',
'docType': 'car'
});
});
});
Test createCar
import { MyChaincode } from '../<path_to_your_chaincode_class>';
import { ChaincodeMockStub, Transform } from "@theledger/fabric-mock-stub";
// You always need your chaincode so it knows which chaincode to invoke on
const chaincode = new MyChaincode();
describe('Test MyChaincode', () => {
it("Should be able to add car", async () => {
const mockStub = new ChaincodeMockStub("MyMockStub", chaincode);
const response = await mockStub.mockInvoke("tx1", ['createCar', `CAR0`, `prop1`, `prop2`, `prop3`, `owner`]);
expect(response.status).to.eql(200)
const response = await mockStub.mockInvoke("tx1", ['queryCar', `CAR0`]);
expect(Transform.bufferToObject(response.payload)).to.deep.eq({
'make': 'prop1',
'model': 'prop2',
'color': 'prop3',
'owner': 'owner',
'docType': 'car'
})
});
});
You are not required to only test using the mockInvoke
and mockInit
. You can directly call the methods on your chaincode or on the mockStub if you really want to.
A remark when using this, depending what you return in your function, you will be able to receive a Buffer or an object in your tests. This is discussed in chaincode
import { MyChaincode } from '../<path_to_your_chaincode_class>';
import { ChaincodeMockStub, Transform } from "@theledger/fabric-mock-stub";
// You always need your chaincode so it knows which chaincode to invoke on
const chaincode = new MyChaincode();
describe('Test MyChaincode', () => {
it("Should be able to add car", async () => {
const stub = new ChaincodeMockStub("MyMockStub", chaincode);
const car0 = {
'make': 'Toyota',
'model': 'Prius',
'color': 'blue',
'owner': 'Tomoko',
'docType': 'car'
};
const car = await chaincode.queryCar(stub, ["CAR0"])
expect(car).to.deep.equal(car0);
});
});
You can do this, but you shouldn't. Your logic should be written in your functions, not your tests.
import { MyChaincode } from '../<path_to_your_chaincode_class>';
import { ChaincodeMockStub, Transform } from "@theledger/fabric-mock-stub";
// You always need your chaincode so it knows which chaincode to invoke on
const chaincode = new MyChaincode();
describe('Test MyChaincode', () => {
it("Should be able to add car", async () => {
const mockStub = new ChaincodeMockStub("MyMockStub", chaincode);
const query = {
selector: {
model: {
"$in": ['Nano', "Punto"]
}
}
};
const it = await mockStub.getQueryResult(JSON.stringify(query));
const items = await Transform.iteratorToList(it);
expect(items).to.be.length(2)
});
});
it("Should get the emitted event", async () => {
const mockStub = new ChaincodeMockStub("MyMockStub", chaincode);
await mockStub.mockInvoke("tx1", ['createCar', `CAR0`, `prop1`, `prop2`, `prop3`, `owner`]);
const eventPayload = await mockStub.getEvent('CREATE_CAR');
expect(eventPayload).to.equal('Car created.');
});
git checkout -b my-new-feature
git commit -am 'Add some feature'
git push origin my-new-feature
The MIT License (MIT)
Copyright (c) 2018 TheLedger
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
FAQs
Mock implementation of the hyperledger fabric-shim package for testing
The npm package @theledger/fabric-mock-stub receives a total of 383 weekly downloads. As such, @theledger/fabric-mock-stub popularity was classified as not popular.
We found that @theledger/fabric-mock-stub demonstrated a not healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released a year ago. It has 3 open source maintainers collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Research
Security News
Socket’s threat research team has detected six malicious npm packages typosquatting popular libraries to insert SSH backdoors.
Security News
MITRE's 2024 CWE Top 25 highlights critical software vulnerabilities like XSS, SQL Injection, and CSRF, reflecting shifts due to a refined ranking methodology.
Security News
In this segment of the Risky Business podcast, Feross Aboukhadijeh and Patrick Gray discuss the challenges of tracking malware discovered in open source softare.