What is circular-json?
The circular-json npm package is designed to handle JSON serialization and deserialization of objects that contain circular references. This is particularly useful when working with complex data structures that would otherwise cause errors with the standard JSON.stringify and JSON.parse methods.
What are circular-json's main functionalities?
Stringify with Circular References
This feature allows you to convert an object with circular references into a JSON string without causing errors. The code sample demonstrates how to stringify an object that references itself.
const CircularJSON = require('circular-json');
const obj = {};
obj.self = obj;
const jsonString = CircularJSON.stringify(obj);
console.log(jsonString);
Parse with Circular References
This feature allows you to parse a JSON string that contains circular references back into an object. The code sample shows how to parse a JSON string that represents an object with a circular reference.
const CircularJSON = require('circular-json');
const jsonString = '{"self":"~"}';
const obj = CircularJSON.parse(jsonString);
console.log(obj);
Other packages similar to circular-json
flatted
Flatted is a similar package that provides a way to serialize and deserialize objects with circular references. It uses a different approach by creating a special JSON format that can be parsed back into the original object. Compared to circular-json, flatted is more modern and actively maintained.
json-stringify-safe
json-stringify-safe is another package that handles circular references during JSON serialization. It provides a drop-in replacement for JSON.stringify that doesn't throw errors on circular references. Unlike circular-json, it does not provide a custom parse method.
CircularJSON
A Working Solution To A Common Problem
A usage example:
var object = {};
object.arr = [
object, object
];
object.arr.push(object.arr);
object.obj = object;
var serialized = CircularJSON.stringify(object);
var unserialized = CircularJSON.parse(serialized);
unserialized.obj === unserialized;
unserialized.arr[0] === unserialized;
unserialized.arr.pop() === unserialized.arr;
A quick summary:
- same as
JSON.stringify
and JSON.parse
methods with same type of arguments (same JSON API, an extra optional argument has been added to .stringify()
to support simple placeholder) - reasonably fast in both serialization and deserialization
- compact serialization for easier and slimmer transportation across environments
- tested and covered over nasty structures too
- compatible with all JavaScript engines
- possibility to do not resolve circular references via extra argument. As example,
CircularJSON.stringify(data, null, null, true)
can produce an output with "[Circular]"
placeholder as other implementations might do.
Dependencies
A proper JSON object must be globally available if the browser/engine does not support it.
Dependencies free if you target IE8 and greater or any server side JS engine.
Bear in mind JSON.parse(CircularJSON.stringify(object))
will work but not produce the expected output.
It is also a bad idea to CircularJSON.parse(JSON.stringify(object))
because of those manipulation used in CircularJSON.stringify()
able to make parsing safe and secure.
As summary: CircularJSON.parse(CircularJSON.stringify(object))
is the way to go, same is for JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(object))
.
Which Version
The usual structure for my repos, the one generated via gitstrap, so:
The API is the same as JSON Object so nothing new to learn here while full test coverage is also in the usual place with some example included.
Why Not the @izs One
The module json-stringify-safe seems to be for console.log()
but it's completely pointless for JSON.parse()
, being latter one unable to retrieve back the initial structure. Here an example:
{
"circularRef": "[Circular]",
"list": [
"[Circular]",
"[Circular]"
]
}
Just type this in your node
console: var o = {}; o.a = o; console.log(o);
. The output will be { a: [Circular] }
... good, but that ain't really solving the problem.
However, if that's all you need, the function used to create that kind of output is probably faster than CircularJSON
and surely fits in less lines of code.
Why Not {{put random name}} Solution
So here the thing: circular references can be wrong but, if there is a need for them, any attempt to ignore them or remove them can be considered just a failure.
Not because the method is bad or it's not working, simply because the circular info, the one we needed and used in the first place, is lost!
In this case, CircularJSON
does even more than just solve circular and recursions: it maps all same objects so that less memory is used as well on deserialization as less bandwidth too!
It's able to redefine those references back later on so the way we store is the way we retrieve and in a reasonably performant way, also trusting the snappy and native JSON
methods to iterate.