Datom ⚛
Table of Contents generated with DocToc
standardized immutable objects in the spirit of datomic, especially suited for use in data pipelines
NOTE: Documentation is still fragmentary. WIP.
Export Bound Methods
If you plan on using methods like new_datom()
or select()
a lot, consider using .export()
:
DATOM = require 'datom'
{ new_datom
select } = DATOM.export()
Now new_datom()
and select()
are methods bound to DATOM
. (Observe that because of the JavaScript
'tear-off' effect, when you do method = DATOM.method
, then method()
will likely fail as its reference to
this
has been lost.)
Creation of Bespoke Library Instances
In order to configure a copy of the library, pass in a settings object:
_DATOM = require 'datom'
settings = { merge_values: false, }
DATOM = new _DATOM.Datom settings
{ new_datom
select } = DATOM.export()
Or, mode idiomatically:
DATOM = new ( require 'datom' ).Datom { merge_values: false, }
{ new_datom
select } = DATOM.export()
The second form also helps to avoid accidental usage of the result of require 'datom'
, which is of
course the same library with a different configuration.
Configuration Parameters
-
merge_values
(boolean, default: true
)—Whether to merge attributes of the second argument to
new_datom()
into the resulting value. When set to false
, new_datom '^somekey', somevalue
will always
result in a datom { $key: '^somekey', $value: somevalue, }
; when left to the default, and if somevalue
is an object, then its attributes will become attributes of the datom, which may result in name clashes in
case any attribute name should start with a $
(dollar sign).
-
freeze
(boolean, default: true
)—Whether to freeze datoms. When set to false
, no freezing will
be performed, which may entail slightly improved performance.
-
dirty
(boolean, default: true
)—Whether to automatically set { $dirty: true, }
when the copy
of a datom has been treated with lets()
and a modifyer function.
Methods
Freezing & Thawing
@freeze = ( d ) ->
@thaw = ( d ) ->
@lets = ( original, modifier ) ->
@set = ( d, k, P... ) ->
@unset = ( d, k ) ->
Stamping
@stamp = ( d, P... ) ->
@unstamp = ( d ) ->
Type Testing
@is_system = ( d ) ->
@is_stamped = ( d ) ->
@is_fresh = ( d ) ->
@is_dirty = ( d ) ->
Value Creation
@new_datom = ( $key, $value, other... ) ->
@new_single_datom = ( $key, $value, other... ) ->
@new_open_datom = ( $key, $value, other... ) ->
@new_close_datom = ( $key, $value, other... ) ->
@new_system_datom = ( $key, $value, other... ) ->
@new_text_datom = ( $value, other... ) ->
@new_end_datom = ->
@new_warning = ( ref, message, d, other... ) ->
Selecting
@select = ( d, selector ) ->
System Properties
d.$key
—key (i.e., type) of a datom.d.$value
—'the' proper value of a datom. This is always used in case new_datom()
was called with a
non-object in the value slot (as in new_datom '^mykey', 123
), or when the library was configured with { merge_values: false, }
.—In case there is no d.$value
, the datom's proper value is the object that would
result from deleting all properties whose names start with a $
(dollar sign).d.$dirty
—whether the object has been (thawed, then) changed (and then frozen again) since its
$dirty
property was last cleared or set to false
.d.$stamped
—whether the object has been marked as 'stamped' (i.e., processed).
WIP
The below copied from PipeDreams docs, to be updated
PipeDreams Datoms (Data Events)
Data streams—of which pull-streams,
PipeStreams, and NodeJS
Streams are examples—do their work by
sending pieces of data (that originate from a data source) through a number of
transforms (to finally end up in a data sink).note
(note) I will ignore here alternative ways of dealing with streams, especially
the EventEmitter
way of dealing with streamed
data.
When I say 'streams', I also implicitly mean 'pipelines'; when I say
'pipelines', I also implicitly mean 'pipelines to stream data' and 'streams'
in general.
When NodeJS streams started out, the thinking about those streams was pretty
much confined to saying that 'a stream is a series of
bytes'. Already back then,
an alternative view took hold (I'm slightly paraphrasing here):
The core interpretation was that stream could be buffers or strings - but the
userland interpretation was that a stream could be anything that is
serializeable [...] it was a sequence of buffers, bytes, strings or objects.
Why not use the same api?
I will no repeat here what I've written about perceived shortcomings of NodeJS
streams;
instead, let me iterate a few observations:
-
In streaming, data is just data. There's no need for having a separate
'Object Mode' or
somesuch.
-
There's a single exception to the above rule, and that is when the data item
being sent down the line is null
. This has historically—by both NodeJS
streams and pull-streams—been interpreted as a termination signal, and I'm not
going to change that (although at some point I might as well).
-
When starting out with streams and building fairly simple-minded pipelines,
sending down either raw pieces of business data or else null
to indicate
termination is enough to satisfy most needs. However, when one transitions to
more complex environments, raw data is not sufficient any more: When
processing text from one format to another, how could a downstream transform
tell whether a given piece of text is raw data or the output of an upstream
transform?
Another case where raw data becomes insufficient are circular
pipelines—pipelines that re-compute (some or all) output values in a recursive
manner. An example which outputs the integer sequences of the Collatz
Conjecture is in the tests
folder.
There, whenever we see an even number n
, we send down that even number n
alongside with half its value, n/2
; whenever we see an odd number n
, we
send it on, followed by its value tripled plus one, 3*n+1
. No matter whether
you put the transform for even numbers in front of that for odd numbers or the
other way round, there will be numbers that come out at the bottom that need
to be re-input into the top of the pipeline, and since there's no telling in
advance how long a Collatz sequence will be for a given integer, it is, in the
general case, insufficient to build a pipeline made from a (necessarily
finite) repetitive sequence of copies of those individual transforms. Thus,
classical streams cannot easily model this kind of processing.
The idea of datoms—short for data atoms, a term borrowed from Rich
Hickey's Datomic—is
to simply to wrap each piece of raw data in a higher-level structure. This is of
course an old idea, but not one that is very prevalent in NodeJS streams, the
fundamental assumption (of classical stream processing) being that all stream
transforms get to process each piece of data, and that all pieces of data are of
equal status (with the exception of null
).
The PipeDreams sample implementation of Collatz Sequences uses datoms to (1)
wrap the numerical pieces of data, which allows to mark data as processed
(a.k.a. 'stamped'), to (2) mark data as 'to be recycled', and to (3) inject
system-level sync
hronization signals into the data stream to make sure that
recycled data gets processed before new data is allowed into the stream.
In PipeDreams datoms, each piece of data is explicitly labelled for its
type; each datom may have a different status: there are system-level
datoms that serve to orchestrate the flow of data within the pipeline; there
are user-level datoms which originate from the application; there are
datoms to indicate the opening and closing of regions (phases) in the data
stream; there are stream transforms that listen to and act on specific
system-level events.
Datoms are JS objects that must minimally have a key
property, a string that
specifies the datom's category, namespace and name; in addition, they may have a
value
property with the payload (where desired), and any number of other
attributes. The property $
is used to carry metadata (e.g. from which line in
a source file a given datom was generated from). Thus, we may give the outline
of a datom as (in a rather informal notation) d := { key, ?value, ?stamped,..., ?$, }
.
The key
of a datom must be a string that consists of at least two parts, the
sigil
and the name
. The sigil
, a single punctuation character, indicates
the 'category' of each datom; there are two levels and three elementary
categories, giving six types of datoms:
-
Application level:
^
for data datoms (a.k.a. 'singletons'),<
for start-of-region datoms,>
for end-of-region datoms.
-
System level:
~
for data datoms,[
for start-of-region datoms,]
for end-of-region datoms.
Normally, one will probably want to send around business data inside (the
value
property of) application-level data datoms (hence their name, also
shortened to D-datoms); however, one can also set other properties of datom
objects, or send data around using properties of start- or end-of-region datoms.
Region events are intended to be used e.g. when parsing text with markup; say
you want to turn a snippet of HTML like this:
<document><div>Helo <em>world!</em></div></document>
into another textual representation, you may want to turn that into a sequence
of datoms similar to these, in the order of sending and regions symbolized by
boxes:note
--------------------------------------------------------+
{ key: '<document', } # d1 |
------------------------------------------------------+ |
{ key: '<div', } # d2 | |
{ key: '^text', value: "Helo ", } # d3 | |
----------------------------------------------------+ | |
{ key: '<em', } # d4 | | |
{ key: '^text' value: "world!", } # d5 | | |
{ key: '>em', } # d6 | | |
----------------------------------------------------+ | |
{ key: '>div', } # d7 | |
------------------------------------------------------+ |
{ key: '>document', } # d8 |
--------------------------------------------------------+
note by 'in the order of sending' I mean you'd have to send datom d1
first, then d2
and so on. Trivial until you imagine you write a pipeline and
then picture how the events will travel down that pipeline:
pipeline.push $do_this() # s1, might be processing d3 right now
pipeline.push $do_that() # s2, might be processing d2 right now
pipeline.push $do_something_else() # s3, might be processing d1 right now
Although there's really no telling whether step s3
will really process datom
d1
at the 'same point in time' that step s2
processes datom d2
and so on
(in the strict sense, this is hardly possible in a single-threaded language
anyway), the visualization still holds a grain of truth: stream transforms
that come 'later' (further down) in the pipeline will see events near the top
of your to-do list first, and vice versa. This can be mildly confusing.
select = ( d, selector ) ->
The select
method can be used to determine whether a given event d
matches a
set of conditions; typically, one will want to use select d, selector
to decide
whether a given event is suitable for processing by the stream transform at
hand, or whether it should be passed on unchanged.
The current implementation of select()
is much dumber and faster than its predecessors; where previously,
it was possible to match datoms with multiple selectors that contained multiple sigils and so forth, the new
version does little more than check wheter the single selector allowed equals the given datom's key
value—that's about it, except that one can still select d, '^somekey#stamped'
to match both unstamped and
stamped datoms.
To Do