Research
Security News
Malicious PyPI Package ‘pycord-self’ Targets Discord Developers with Token Theft and Backdoor Exploit
Socket researchers uncover the risks of a malicious Python package targeting Discord developers.
install go-ipfs from npm
Install the latest go-ipfs binary.
npm install -g go-ipfs
Installs from https://gobuilder.me/github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/cmd/ipfs.
> npm install -g go-ipfs
> ipfs version
ipfs version 0.4.7
> npm install go-ipfs
> node_modules/.bin/ipfs
ipfs version 0.4.7
See IPFS getting-started. If anything goes wrong, try using: http://ipfs.io/docs/install.
Warning: this module uses the latest version of ipfs. If there is a strong need to vendor an older version, let us know. We care about versions very much :( but for a number of reasons, this is easier for us all right now.
Warning: the file bin/ipfs
is a placeholder, when downloading stuff, it gets replaced. so if you run node install.js
it will then be dirty in the git repo. Do not commit this file, as then you would be commiting a big binary and publishing it to npm. (TODO: add a pre-commit or pre-publish hook that warns about this)
You should be able to just run ./publish.sh
for example:
> ./publish.sh
usage ./publish.sh <version>
publish a version of go-ipfs to npm
> ./publish.sh 0.3.11
This will:
bin/ipfs
is right (must be the checked in file)package.json
and README.md
git commit
the changesgo-ipfs@$version
to https://npmjs.com/package/go-ipfsOpen an issue in the repo if you run into trouble.
If some problem happens, and you need to publish a new version of this module targetting the same go-ipfs version, then please follow this convention:
<go-ipfs-version>
<go-ipfs-version>-hacky<num>
Why do this?
Well, if you previously published npm module go-ipfs@0.4.0
and there was a problem, we now must publish a different version, but we want to keep the version number the same. so the strategy is to publish as go-ipfs@0.4.0-hacky1
, and unpublish go-ipfs@0.4.0
.
Why
-hacky<num>
?
Because it is unlikely to be a legitimate go-ipfs version, and we want to support go-ipfs versions like floodsub-1
etc.
Do i have to say
-hacky<num>
or can i just use-<num>
?
-<num>
won't work, as link-ipfs.js expects -hacky<num>
. If you want to
change the convention, go for it, and update this readme accordingly.
Feel free to join in. All welcome. Open an issue!
This repository falls under the IPFS Code of Conduct.
FAQs
Install the latest go-ipfs binary
The npm package go-ipfs receives a total of 404 weekly downloads. As such, go-ipfs popularity was classified as not popular.
We found that go-ipfs demonstrated a not healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released a year ago. It has 8 open source maintainers collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Research
Security News
Socket researchers uncover the risks of a malicious Python package targeting Discord developers.
Security News
The UK is proposing a bold ban on ransomware payments by public entities to disrupt cybercrime, protect critical services, and lead global cybersecurity efforts.
Security News
Snyk's use of malicious npm packages for research raises ethical concerns, highlighting risks in public deployment, data exfiltration, and unauthorized testing.