html-aria
Utilities for creating accessible HTML based on the latest ARIA 1.3 specs and latest HTML in ARIA recommendations. Lightweight, performant, tree-shakeable, and 0 dependencies.
This is designed to be a better replacement for aria-query when working with HTML. The reasons are:
- aria-query neglects the critical HTML to ARIA spec. With just the ARIA spec alone, it’s insufficient for working with HTML.
- html-aria supports ARIA 1.3 while aria-query is still on ARIA 1.2
html-aria is also designed to be easier-to-use to prevent mistakes, smaller, is ESM tree-shakeable, and more performant (~100× faster than aria-query).
Setup
npm i html-aria
Examples
Though this library is NOT a lint plugin, it can do most of the work for you. You only need to traverse the AST of the language you’re using (e.g. HTML vs React vs Svelte), and html-aria can validate the nodes.
ESLint + React plugin
import { ESLintUtils, TSESTree } from "@typescript-eslint/utils";
import {
getSupportedAttributes,
type AriaAttribute,
type TagName,
} from "html-aria";
const createRule = ESLintUtils.RuleCreator(
(name) => `https://example.com/rule/${name}`
);
export default createRule({
name: "no-unsupported-aria",
meta: {
type: "problem",
docs: { description: "Ensure that ARIA attributes match their role" },
messages: {
"not-allowed": "Attribute {{ name }} not allowed",
},
},
create(context) {
return {
JSXOpeningElement(node) {
if (node.name.type !== TSESTree.AST_NODE_TYPES.JSXIdentifier) {
return;
}
const tagName = node.name.name as TagName;
const attributes: Record<
string,
string | number | boolean | undefined | null
> = {};
for (const attr of node.attributes) {
if (
attr.type === TSESTree.JSXSpreadAttribute ||
attr.name.type === TSESTree.JSXNamespacedName ||
attr.value?.type === TSESTree.Literal
) {
continue;
}
attributes[attr.name.name] = attr.value.value as
| string
| number
| boolean
| undefined
| null;
}
const tag: VirtualElement = { tagName, attributes };
const supportedAttributes = getSupportedAttributes(tag);
for (const attr of node.attributes) {
if (attr.type !== TSESTree.AST_NODE_TYPES.JSXAttribute) {
continue;
}
const name =
typeof attr.name.name === "string"
? attr.name.name
: (attr.name.name.name as ARIAAttribute);
if (name.startsWith("aria-") && !supportedAttributes.includes(name)) {
context.report({
node: name,
messageId: "not-allowed",
data: { name },
});
}
}
},
};
},
});
Have an improvement to suggest? Please open a PR!
API
getRole()
Determine which HTML maps to which default ARIA role.
import { getRole } from "html-aria";
getRole(document.createElement("article"));
getRole({ tagName: "input", attributes: { type: "checkbox" } });
getRole({ tagName: "div", attributes: { role: "button" } });
It’s important to note that inferring ARIA roles from HTML isn’t always straightforward! There are 3 types of role inference:
- Tag map: 1 tag → 1 ARIA role.
- Tag + attribute map: Tags + attributes are needed to determine the ARIA role (e.g.
input[type="radio"]
→ radio
) - Tag + DOM tree: Tags + DOM tree structure are needed to determine the ARIA role.
See a list of all elements.
getSupportedRoles() / isSupportedRole()
The spec dictates that certain elements may NOT receive certain roles. For example, <div role="button">
is allowed (not recommended, but allowed), but <select role="button">
is not. getSupportedRoles()
will return all valid roles for a given element + attributes.
import { getSupportedRoles } from "html-aria";
getSupportedRoles(document.createElement("img"));
getSupportedRoles({ tagName: "img", attributes: { alt: "Image caption" } });
There is also a helper method isSupportedRole()
to make individual assertions:
import { isSupportedRole } from "html-aria";
isSupportedRole({ tagName: "select" }, "combobox");
isSupportedRole(
{ tagName: "select", attributes: { multiple: true } },
"listbox"
);
isSupportedRole({ tagName: "select" }, "listbox");
isSupportedRole({ tagName: "select" }, "button");
getSupportedAttributes() / isSupportedAttribute()
For any element, list all supported aria-* attributes, including attributes inherited from superclasses. This takes in an HTML element, not an ARIA role, because in some cases the HTML element actually affects the list (see full list).
import { getSupportedAttributes } from "html-aria";
getSupportedAttributes({ tagName: "button" });
If you want to look up by ARIA role instead, just pass in a placeholder element:
getSupportedAttributes({ tagName: "div", attributes: { role: "combobox" } });
There’s also a helper method isSupportedAttribute()
to test individual attributes:
import { isSupportedAttribute } from "html-aria";
isSupportedAttribute({ tagName: "button" }, "aria-pressed");
isSupportedAttribute({ tagName: "button" }, "aria-checked");
It’s worth noting that HTML elements may factor in according to the spec—providing the role
isn’t enough. See aria-* attributes from HTML.
getElements()
Return all HTML elements that represent a given ARIA role, if any. If no HTML elements represent this role, undefined
will be returned. This is essentially the inverse of getRole()
.
import { getElements } from "html-aria";
getElements("button");
getElements("radio");
getElements("rowheader");
getElements("tab");
Worth noting that this is slightly-different from a related concept or base concept.
isInteractive()
Return true
if a given HTML tag may be interacted with or not.
isInteractive({ tagName: "button" });
isInteractive({ tagName: "div" });
isInteractive({ tagName: "div", attributes: { tabindex: 0 } });
isInteractive({ tagName: "div", attributes: { role: "button", tabindex: 0 } });
isInteractive({ tagName: "hr" });
isInteractive({
tagName: "hr",
attributes: { tabindex: 0, "aria-valuenow": 10 },
});
The methodology for this is somewhat complex to follow the complete ARIA specification:
- If the role is a widget or window subclass, then it is interactive
- Note: if the element manually specifies
role
, and if it natively is NOT a widget or window role, tabindex
must also be supplied
- If the element is
disabled
or aria-disabled
, then it is NOT interactive - Handle some explicit edge cases like separator
Note that aria-hidden
elements may be interactive (even if it’s not best practice) as a part of 2.4.5 Multiple Ways if an alternative is made for screenreaders, etc.
isNameRequired()
For a role, return whether or not an accessible name is required for screenreaders.
import { isNameRequired } from "html-aria";
isNameRequired("link");
isNameRequired("cell");
Note: this does NOT mean aria-label
is required! Quite the opposite—if a name is required, it’s always best to have the name visible in content. See ARIA 1.3 Accessible Name Calculation for more info.
isValidAttributeValue()
Some aria-* attributes require specific values. isValidAttributeValue()
returns false
if, given a specific aria-* attribute, the value is invalid according to the spec.
import { isValidAttributeValue } from "html-aria";
isValidAttributeValue("aria-label", "This is a label");
isValidAttributeValue("aria-label", "");
isValidAttributeValue("aria-disabled", true);
isValidAttributeValue("aria-disabled", false);
isValidAttributeValue("aria-disabled", "true");
isValidAttributeValue("aria-disabled", 1);
isValidAttributeValue("aria-disabled", "disabled");
isValidAttributeValue("aria-checked", "true");
isValidAttributeValue("aria-checked", "mixed");
isValidAttributeValue("aria-checked", "checked");
isValidAttribute("aria-valuenow", "15");
isValidAttribute("aria-valuenow", 15);
isValidAttribute("aria-valuenow", 0);
⚠️ Be mindful of cases where a valid value may still be valid, but invoke different behavior according to the ARIA role, e.g. mixed
behavior for radio
/menuitemradio
/switch
Reference
ARIA roles from HTML
This outlines the requirements to adhere to the W3C spec when it comes to inferring the correct ARIA roles from HTML. Essentially, there are 3 types of inference:
- Tag map: 1 tag → 1 ARIA role.
- Tag + attribute map: Tags + attributes are needed to determine the ARIA role (e.g.
input[type="radio"]
→ radio
) - Tag + DOM tree: Tags + DOM tree structure are needed to determine the ARIA role.
Here are all the HTML elements where either attributes, hierarchy, or both are necessary to determine the correct role. Any HTML elements not listed here follow the simple “tag map” approach (keep in mind that aria-* attributes may not follow the same rules!).
Element | Role | Attribute-based | Hierarchy-based |
---|
a | generic | link | ✅ | |
area | generic | link | ✅ | |
footer | contentinfo | generic | | ✅ |
header | banner | generic | | ✅ |
input | button | checkbox | combobox | radio | searchbox | slider | spinbutton | textbox | ✅ | |
li | listitem | generic | | ✅ |
section | generic | region | ✅ | |
select | combobox | listbox | ✅ | |
td | cell | gridcell | — | | ✅ |
th | columnheader | rowheader | — | ✅ | ✅ |
Note: —
= no corresponding role
aria-* attributes from HTML
Further, a common mistake many simple accessibility libraries make is mapping aria-* attributes to ARIA roles. While that mostly works, there are a few exceptions where HTML information is needed. That is why getSupportedAttributes()
takes an HTML element. Here is a full list:
Element | Default Role | Notes |
---|
audio | — | Accepts application aria-* attributes by default |
base | generic | No aria-* attributes allowed |
body | generic | Does NOT allow aria-hidden="true" |
br | generic | No aria-* attributes allowed EXCEPT aria-hidden |
col | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
colgroup | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
datalist | listbox | No aria-* attributes allowed |
head | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
html | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
img (no alt ) | none | No aria-* attributes allowed EXCEPT aria-hidden |
input[type=checkbox] | — | Forbids aria-checked |
input[type=color] | — | Acts as a generic element but allows aria-disabled |
input[type=files] | — | Acts as a generic element but allows aria-disabled , aria-invalid , and aria-required |
input[type=hidden] | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
input[type=radio] | — | Forbids aria-checked |
link | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
map | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
meta | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
noscript | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
picture | — | No aria-* attributes allowed EXCEPT aria-hidden |
script | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
slot | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
source | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
style | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
summary | — | Allows aria-disabled and aria-haspopup regardless of role |
template | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
title | — | No aria-* attributes allowed |
track | — | No aria-* attributes allowed EXCEPT aria-hidden |
video | — | Accepts application aria-* attributes by default |
wbr | — | No aria-* attributes allowed EXCEPT aria-hidden |
Note: —
= no corresponding role. Also worth pointing out that in other cases, global aria-* attributes are allowed, so this is unique to the element and NOT the ARIA role.
Technical deviations from the spec
Mark
The <mark>
tag gets the mark
role. Seems logical, right? Well, not according to the spec. It’s not listed in the HTML in ARIA spec, and it’s worth noting that <mark>
is a related concept, not a base concept as elements usually are.
But despite the ARIA specs being pretty clear that <mark>
and mark
aren’t directly equivalent, all modern browsers today seem to think they are, and <mark>
always gets a mark
role. For that reason, html-aria has sided with practical browser implementation rather than the ARIA spec.
SVG
SVG is tricky. Though the spec says <svg>
should get the graphics-document
role by default, browsers chose chaos. Firefox 134 displays graphics-document
, Chrome 131 defaults to image
(previously it returned nothing, or other roles), and Safari defaults to generic
(which is one of the worst roles you could probably give it).
Since we have 1 spec and 1 browser agreeing, this library defaults to graphics-document
. Though the best answer is SVGs should ALWAYS get an explicit role
.
Ancestor-based roles
In regards to ARIA roles in HTML, the spec gives non-semantic roles to <td>
, <th>
, and <li>
UNLESS they are used inside specific containers (table
, grid
, or gridcell
for <td>
/<th>
; list
or menu
for <li>
). This library assumes they’re being used in their proper containers without requiring the ancestors
array. This is done to avoid the footgun of requiring missable configuration to produce accurate results, which is bad software design.
Instead, the non-semantic roles must be “opted in” by passing an explicitly-empty ancestors array:
import { getRole } from "html-aria";
getRole({ tagName: "td" }, { ancestors: [] });
getRole({ tagName: "th" }, { ancestors: [] });
getRole({ tagName: "li" }, { ancestors: [] });
FAQ
Why the { tagName: string }
object syntax?
Most of the time this library will be used in a Node.js environment, likely outside the DOM (e.g. an ESLint plugin traversing an AST). While most methods also allow an HTMLElement as input, the object syntax is universal and works in any context.
What’s the difference between “no corresponding role” and the none
role?
From the spec:
No corresponding role
The elements marked with No corresponding role, in the second column of the table do not have any implicit ARIA semantics, but they do have meaning and this meaning may be represented in roles, states and properties not provided by ARIA, and exposed to users of assistive technology via accessibility APIs. It is therefore recommended that authors add a role
attribute to a semantically neutral element such as a div
or span, rather than overriding the semantics of the listed elements.
none
role
An element whose implicit native role semantics will not be mapped to the accessibility API. See synonym presentation.
In other words, none
is more of a decisive “this element is presentational and can be ignored” labeling, while “no corresponding role” means “this element doesn’t have predefined behavior that can be automatically determined, and the author should provide additional information such as explicit role
s and ARIA states and properties.”
In html-aria, “no corresponding role” is represented as undefined
.
What is the difference between “unsupported attributes” and “prohibited attributes?”
In the spec, you’ll find language describing both roles and attributes in 4 categories:
- Supported and recommended: valid and recommended to use
- Supported but not recommended: valid, but may cause unpredictable behavior
- Unsupported, but not prohibited: these are omitted both from supported and prohibited lists
- Unsupported and prohibited: explicitly prohibited
As stated in Project Goals, html-aria aims to not conflate non-normative recommendations as normative guidelines. So in the API, getSupportedRoles() and getSupportedAttributes() will return 1 and 2, but not 3 or 4.
While there is a technical distinction between 3 and 4, for the purposees of html-aria they’re treated the same (because 3 specifically is not explicitly allowed, we can make a choice to read it as prohibited).
About
Project Goals
- Implement all ARIA spec docs, not just the roles specification
- Stick to normative guidelines (i.e. only implement “MUST” language, not “SHOULD”—the latter is the area of linters)
- Reduce mistakes with explicit methods and user-friendly API design.