Research
Security News
Threat Actor Exposes Playbook for Exploiting npm to Build Blockchain-Powered Botnets
A threat actor's playbook for exploiting the npm ecosystem was exposed on the dark web, detailing how to build a blockchain-powered botnet.
is-immutable-type
Advanced tools
Test the immutability of TypeScript types.
Any donations would be much appreciated. 😄
# Install with npm
npm install is-immutable-type
# Install with yarn
yarn add is-immutable-type
# Install with pnpm
pnpm add is-immutable-type
import { getTypeImmutability, Immutability, isReadonlyDeep, isUnknown } from "is-immutable-type";
import { hasType } from "ts-api-utils";
import type ts from "typescript";
function example(program: ts.Program, node: ts.Node) {
const typeNodeOrType = hasType(node)
// Use the TypeNode if it's avaliable.
? node.type
// Otherwise, get the Type.
: program.getTypeChecker().getTypeAtLocation(node);
const immutability = getTypeImmutability(program, typeNodeOrType);
if (isUnknown(immutability)) {
console.log("`immutability` is `Unknown`").
} else if (isReadonlyDeep(immutability)) {
console.log("`immutability` is `ReadonlyDeep` or `Immutable`").
} else {
console.log("`immutability` is `ReadonlyShallow` or `Mutable`").
}
}
Tip: You can also use comparator expressions (such as >
and <
) to compare
Immutability
.
Note: Immutability.Unknown
will always return false
when used in a
comparator expression. This includes ===
- use isUnknown()
if you need to
test if a value is Unknown
.
Immutable
: Everything is deeply read only and nothing can be modified.ReadonlyDeep
: The data is deeply immutable but methods are not.ReadonlyShallow
: The data is shallowly immutable, but at least one deep value is not.Mutable
: The data is shallowly mutable.Unknown
: We couldn't determine the immutability of the type.Note: Calculating
is used internally to mean that we are still calculating the
immutability of the type. You shouldn't ever need to use this value.
Sometimes we cannot correctly tell what a type's immutability is supposed to be just by analyzing its type makeup. One common reason for this is because methods may modify internal state and we cannot tell this just by the method's type. For this reason, we allow types to be overridden.
To override a type, pass an overrides array of all the override objects you want
to use to your function call.
An override object consists of a type
, a to
and optionally a from
property. The type
property specifies the type that will be overridden.
The to
property specifies the new immutability value that will be used.
The from
property, if given, will limit when the override is applied to when
the calculated immutability is between the to
value and this value
(inclusively).
The type
is specified with a TypeSpecifier
.
This can either be a string
that will match against the type's name or a regex
pattern that will match against the the type's name and any type arguments.
Additionally, you can specify where the type needs to come from for it to be
overridden.
To do this, use an object, with either a name
or pattern
value; and a from
property. This from
property specifies where the type needs to come from,
either lib
(TypeScript's lib), package
(a node_modules package), or file
(a local file).
Always treat TypeScript's ReadonlyArray
s as Immutable
.
[{ type: { from: "lib", name: "ReadonlyArray" }, to: Immutability.Immutable, }]
Treat TypeScript's ReadonlyArray
s as Immutable
instead of ReadonlyDeep
.
But if the instance type was calculated as ReadonlyShallow
, it will stay as
such.
[{ type: { from: "lib", name: "ReadonlyArray" }, to: Immutability.Immutable, from: Immutability.ReadonlyDeep }]
By default the following TypeScript lib types are overridden to be Mutable
:
Map
Set
Date
URL
URLSearchParams
If you know of any other TypeScript lib types that need to be overridden, please open an issue.
Note: When providing custom overrides, the default ones will not be used. Be
sure to include the default overrides in your custom overrides if you don't want
to lose them. You can obtain them with getDefaultOverrides()
.
Currently due to limitations in TypeScript, it is impossible to write a utility type that will transform any given type to an immutable version of it in all cases. (See this issue)
One popular implementation of such a utility type is
type-fest's
ReadonlyDeep
type. If you want this library to treat types wrapped in ReadonlyDeep
as
immutable regardless, you can provide an override stating as such.
[{ type: { from: "package", package: "type-fest" pattern: /^ReadonlyDeep<.+>$/u }, to: Immutability.Immutable }]
Currently we cannot override primitives or aliases of primitives.
For example, if we have the following code:
type A = string;
type B = A;
We cannot override A
, B
or string
here.
The reason we cannot override the aliases is because, internally, TypeScript
discards both A
and B
and just uses string
in their place.
By default we use a global cache to speed up the calculation of multiple types' immutability. This prevents us from needing to calculate the immutability of the same types over and over again.
However, this cache assumes you are always using the same type checker. If you
need to use multiple (such as in a testing environment), this can lead to
issues. To prevent this, you can provide a custom cache (by passing a WeakMap
)
to be used or have a temporary cache be used (by passing false
).
ReadonlyDeep
types Immutable
Many types that you may expect to be immutable (including those defined
internally by TypeScript itself) are not written with immutable methods and thus
are not reported as immutable by this library. Luckily it is quite easy to make
such type immutable. Just simply wrap them in Readonly
.
These types are ReadonlyDeep
:
type Foo = ReadonlySet<string>;
type Bar = ReadonlyMap<string, number>;
While these types are Immutable
:
type Foo = Readonly<ReadonlySet<string>>;
type Bar = Readonly<ReadonlyMap<string, number>>;
However it should be noted that this does not work for arrays. TypeScript will
treat Readonly<Array<T>>
exactly the same as ReadonlyArray<T>
and
as a consequence Readonly<ReadonlyArray<T>>
is also treated the same.
In order to get around this, we need to slightly tweak the Readonly
definition
like so:
type ImmutableShallow<T extends {}> = {
readonly [P in keyof T & {}]: T[P];
};
Now the follow will correctly be marked as Immutable
.
type Foo = ImmutableShallow<readonly string[]>;
type Bar = ImmutableShallow<ReadonlyArray<string>>;
Note: ImmutableShallow<string[]>
will also be marked as immutable but the type
will still have methods such as push
and pop
. Be sure to pass a readonly
array to ImmutableShallow
to prevent this.
FAQs
Check the immutability of TypeScript types
The npm package is-immutable-type receives a total of 181,951 weekly downloads. As such, is-immutable-type popularity was classified as popular.
We found that is-immutable-type demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 0 open source maintainers collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Research
Security News
A threat actor's playbook for exploiting the npm ecosystem was exposed on the dark web, detailing how to build a blockchain-powered botnet.
Security News
NVD’s backlog surpasses 20,000 CVEs as analysis slows and NIST announces new system updates to address ongoing delays.
Security News
Research
A malicious npm package disguised as a WhatsApp client is exploiting authentication flows with a remote kill switch to exfiltrate data and destroy files.