Security News
npm Updates Search Experience with New Objective Sorting Options
npm has a revamped search experience with new, more transparent sorting options—Relevance, Downloads, Dependents, and Publish Date.
~1kB inversion of control container for Typescript/Javascrith with a focus on async flow
🚧 library is in alpha dev mode 🚧
~2kB inversion of control container for Typescript/Javascript for constructor injection with a focus on async flow
@decorators
or framework extends
in your application logicreflect-metadata
or decoratorsreflect-metadata
or decorators so there are no need to hack in decorator and "decoratorMetadata"
support into Create React App, node.js, next.js, snowpack, esbuild etc.Snow-Splash is an alternative to InversifyJS and microsoft/tsyringe. It relies on plain JS functions, objects and familiar patterns. There is no need to learn complex API to use it in a full capacity.
npm install -S snow-splash
// Step 1: Your application logic stays clean
class Oven {
public pizzasInOven() {
return 3
}
public async preheat() {}
}
class Kitchen {
constructor(public oven: Oven, public manual: string) {}
}
// Step 2: Add and read simple tokens
import { makeRoot } from "snow-splash"
let root = makeRoot().add({
userManual: "Please preheat before use",
oven: () => new Oven(),
})
root.get("oven")
// Step 3: Add a usefull async provider / container
const kitchenContainer = async ({ oven, userManual }) => {
await oven.preheat()
return {
kitchen: new Kitchen(oven, userManual),
}
}
// Step 4: Add an async provider
const node = root.add((node) => ({
kitchen: async () =>
kitchenContainer(await node.getContainerSet(["userManual", "oven"])),
}))
root.get("oven") // Oven
await node.get("kitchen") // { kitchen: Kitchen }
// Typical usage in React
export const PizzaData = () => {
const [oven] = useContainer().oven
return <> Pizzaz In Oven: {oven.pizzasInOven()}</>
}
Libraries like InversifyJS or tsyringe rely on decorators and reflect-metadata
.
Firstly, decorators unnecessary couple your application logic with a framework.
Secondly, it is very hard to use with starters like CRA, Next.js etc. To use reflect-metadata
you need to configure your compiler (babel, typescrip, esbuild, swc etc.) configuratoin which is not trivial. So if you can’t use reflect-metadata
you can't use inversify.
Reading
// Get a single instance
root.get("oven") // Creates a new Oven instance
root.get("oven") // Gets a cached Oven instance
await node.get("kitchen") // { kitchen: Kitchen } also cached
await node.containers.kitchen // same as above
// Get multiple instances at once
await root.getContainerSet(["oven", "userManual"]) // { userManual: '...', oven: Oven }
await root.getContainerSet((c) => [c.userManual, c.oven]) // same as above
// Subscribe to container changes
node.subscribeToContiner("oven", (oven) => {})
node.subscribeToContinerSet(["oven", "kitchen"], ({ oven, kitchen }) => {})
// prettier-ignore
node.subscribeToContinerSet((c) => [c.kitchen], ({ oven, kitchen }) => {})
node.on("containerUpdated", ({ key, newContainer }) => {})
node.on("containerUpserted", ({ key, newContainer }) => {})
Writing
let node1 = makeRoot()
.add({
userManual: "Please preheat before use",
oven: () => new Oven(),
})
.upsert((node) => ({
userManual: "Works better when hot",
preheatedOven: async () => {
await node.get("oven").preheat()
return node.get("oven")
},
}))
// `add` is typesafe and a runtime safe method. Hence we've used `upsert`
try {
node1.add({
// @ts-expect-error
userManual: "You shall not pass",
// Type Error: (property) userManual: "You are overwriting this token. It is not safe. Use an unsafe `upsert` method"
})
} catch (err) {
err.message // Error Tokens already exist: ['userManual']
}
import { Oven, Kitchen } from "./kitchen/"
export async function provideKitchenContainer() {
const oven = new Oven()
await oven.preheat()
return {
kitchen: new Kitchen(),
oven: oven,
}
}
import { Oven, Kitchen } from "./kitchen/"
export async function provideKitchenContainer() {
return {
kitchen: () => new Kitchen(),
oven: async () => {
const oven = new Oven()
await oven.preheat()
return oven
},
}
}
export async function provideKitchenContainer() {
const { Kitchen } = await import("./kitchen/kitchen")
return {
kitchen: () => new Kitchen(),
oven: async () => {
const { Oven } = await import("./kitchen/oven")
const oven = new Oven()
await oven.preheat()
return oven
},
}
}
If you use callback pattern across your app, you will be able to mass rename your containerKeys using typescript. With strings, you will have to manually go through the app. On the bright side, compiler will not compile until you fix your rename manually across the app.
const node = makeRoot().addNode({
a: "A",
b: "B",
})
await node.get((containerKeys) => containerKeys.a) // BEST!!!
await node.get("a") // it will work but...
This will help resolve some very exotic race conditions with subscriptions and container updates. We internally seal()
our node on every get
request but you can do it too before non trivial operations
await makeRoot()
.addPromise(async () => ({
a: "A",
b: "B",
}))
.seal() // Good
The best way to get started is to check a CRA Pizza example
Initial wiring
import { makeRoot } from "../../src/library.new-root-container"
import { provideAContainer } from "./container.a"
import { provideBContainer } from "./container.b"
import { provideCContainer } from "./container.c"
export type MockAppNode = ReturnType<typeof getMainMockAppContainer>
export function getMainMockAppContainer() {
let node = makeRoot()
let k = node
.add({ aCont: async () => provideAContainer() })
.add((c) => {
return {
bCont: async () => provideBContainer(await c.get("aCont")),
}
})
.add((c) => {
return {
cCont: async () =>
provideCContainer(await c.get("aCont"), await c.get("bCont"), k),
}
})
return k
}
Snow-Splash has a good typescript support
Containers are an important unit. If you replace them, users will be notified. In React it happens automatically
const kitchenApp = new RootContainer((ctx) => ({
// you can use tokens (`oven`, `kitchen`) here and later on
oven: async () => ovenContainer(),
kitchen: async () => kitchenContainer(await ctx.oven()),
}))
kitchenApp.on("containerCreated", (event) => {
console.log(`event: 'containerCreated' ~~> token: '${event.key}'`)
// `event.container` is also avaliable here
})
kitchenApp.on("containerRequested", (event) => {
console.log(`event: 'containerRequested' ~~> token: '${event.key}' `)
})
kitchenApp.on("containerRemoved", (event) => {
console.log(`event: 'containerRemoved' ~~> token: '${event.key}' `)
})
await kitchenApp.containers.kitchen
// event: 'containerRequested' ~~> token: 'kitchen'
// event: 'containerRequested' ~~> token: 'oven'
// event: 'containerCreated' ~~> token: 'oven'
// event: 'containerCreated' ~~> token: 'kitchen'
// Notice how oven was created before kitchen.
// This is because kitcen depends on oven
makeRoot
Setting app rootimport { makeRoot, RootContainer } from "../../library.root-container"
export function getMainMockAppContainer() {
// check get providers above
return makeRoot(getProviders)
}
containers
getterlet appRoot = getMainPizzaAppContainer()
let kitchen = await appRoot.containers.kitchen
kitchen.oven.pizzaCapacity // 4
getContainerSet
getContainerSetNew
upsert
When containers are updated React is updated too via hooks
inversifyjs
, tsyringe
and othersInversion of Control (IoC) is a great way to decouple the application and the most popular pattern of IoC is dependency injection (DI) but it is not limited to one.
In JavaScript there is not way to create a dependency injection without mixing application logic with a specific IoC library code or hacking a compiler (reflect-metadata).
inversifyjs
and tsyringe
use decorators and reflect-metada
import { injectable } from "tsyringe"
@injectable()
class Foo {
constructor(private database: Database) {}
}
// some other file
import "reflect-metadata"
import { container } from "tsyringe"
import { Foo } from "./foo"
const instance = container.resolve(Foo)
typed-inject
uses monkey-patching
import { createInjector } from "typed-inject"
function barFactory(foo: number) {
return foo + 1
}
barFactory.inject = ["foo"] as const
class Baz {
constructor(bar: number) {
console.log(`bar is: ${bar}`)
}
static inject = ["bar"] as const
}
With Snow-Splash your application logic is not mixed with the framework code
import type { Ingredients } from "./store.ingrediets"
import type { Oven } from "./store.oven"
export class Kitchen {
constructor(private oven: Oven, private ingredients: Ingredients) {}
}
// provider / factory
import { IngredientsService } from "../services/ingredients-manager"
import { Kitchen } from "../stores/store.kitchen"
import { Oven } from "../stores/store.oven"
export async function provideKitchenContainer() {
let oven = new Oven()
let ingredients = await IngredientsService.buySomeIngredients()
let kitchen = new Kitchen(oven, ingredients)
return {
oven: oven,
ingredients: ingredients,
kitchen: kitchen,
}
}
Notable inspirations:
Can I have multiple application containers?
Yes, no problem at all. If you want, they can even share tokens and hence instances!
Why getContainerSet
is always async?
This is temporary(?) limitation to keep typescript happy and typescript types reasonable sane
FAQs
~1kB Dependency Injection Library for Typescript and React with a unique async flow support
The npm package iti receives a total of 1,625 weekly downloads. As such, iti popularity was classified as popular.
We found that iti demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 0 open source maintainers collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
npm has a revamped search experience with new, more transparent sorting options—Relevance, Downloads, Dependents, and Publish Date.
Security News
A supply chain attack has been detected in versions 1.95.6 and 1.95.7 of the popular @solana/web3.js library.
Research
Security News
A malicious npm package targets Solana developers, rerouting funds in 2% of transactions to a hardcoded address.