mobx-react
Package with react component wrapper for combining React with mobx.
Exports the observer
decorator and some development utilities.
For documentation, see the mobx project.
This package supports both React and React-Native.
Installation
npm install mobx-react --save
import {observer} from 'mobx-react';
import {observer} from 'mobx-react/native';
import {observer} from 'mobx-react/custom';
This package provides the bindings for MobX and React.
See the official documentation for how to get started.
Boilerplate projects that use mobx-react
- Minimal MobX, React, ES6, JSX, Hot reloading: MobX-React-Boilerplate
- TodoMVC MobX, React, ES6, JSX, Hot reloading: MobX-React-TodoMVC
- Minimal MobX, React, Typescript, TSX: MobX-React-Typescript-Boilerplate
- Minimal MobX, React, ES6(babel), JSPM with hot reloading modules:
jspm-react
- React-Native Counter: Mobx-React-Native-Counter
API documentation
observer(componentClass)
Function (and decorator) that converts a React component definition, React component class or stand-alone render function into a reactive component.
See the mobx documentation for more details.
import {observer} from "mobx-react";
const TodoView = observer(React.createClass({
displayName: "TodoView",
render() {
return <div>{this.props.todo.title}</div>
}
}));
@observer class TodoView extends React.Component {
render() {
return <div>{this.props.todo.title}</div>
}
}
const TodoView = observer(({todo}) => <div>{todo.title}</div>)
It is possible to set a custom shouldComponentUpdate
, but in general this should be avoid as MobX will by default provide a highly optimized shouldComponentUpdate
implementation, based on PureRenderMixin
.
If a custom shouldComponentUpdate
is provided, it is consulted when the props changes (because the parent passes new props) or the state changes (as a result of calling setState
), but if an observable used by the rendering is changed, the component will be re-rendered and shouldComponent
is not consulted.
componentWillReact
(lifecycle hook)
React components usually render on a fresh stack, so that makes it often hard to figure out what caused a component to re-render.
When using mobx-react
you can define a new life cycle hook, componentWillReact
(pun intended) that will be triggered when a component will be scheduled to re-render because
data it observes has changed. This makes it easy to trace renders back to the action that caused the rendering.
import {observer} from "mobx-react";
@observer class TodoView extends React.Component {
componentWillReact() {
console.log("I will re-render, since the todo has changed!");
}
render() {
return <div>{this.props.todo.title}</div>
}
}
componentWillReact
doesn't take argumentscomponentWillReact
won't fire before the initial render (use componentWillMount
instead)componentWillReact
won't fire when receiving new props or after setState
calls (use componentWillUpdate
instead)
propTypes
MobX-react provides the following additional propTypes
which can be used to validate against MobX structures:
observableArray
observableArrayOf(React.PropTypes.number)
observableMap
observableObject
arrayOrObservableArray
arrayOrObservableArrayOf(React.PropTypes.number)
objectOrObservableObject
Provider
and inject
(Experimental)
This feature is marked as experimental as the exact api might change in a next minor, pending any community feedback.
Provider
is a component that can pass stores (or other stuff) using React's context mechanism to child components.
This is useful if you have things that you don't want to pass through multiple layers of components explicitly.
inject
can be used to pick up those stores. It is a higher order component that takes a list of strings and makes those stores available to the wrapped component.
Example (based on the official context docs):
@inject("color") @observer
class Button extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<button style={{background: this.props.color}}>
{this.props.children}
</button>
);
}
}
class Message extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.text} <Button>Delete</Button>
</div>
);
}
}
class MessageList extends React.Component {
render() {
const children = this.props.messages.map((message) =>
<Message text={message.text} />
);
return <Provider color="red">
<div>
{children}
</div>
</Provider>;
}
}
Notes:
- If a component asks for a store and receives a store via a property with the same name, the property takes precedence. Use this to your advantage when testing!
- Values provided through
Provider
should be final, to avoid issues like mentioned in React #2517 and React #3973, where optimizations might stop the propagation of new context. Instead, make sure that if you put things in context
that might change over time, that they are @observable
or provide some other means to listen to changes, like callbacks. - When using both
@inject
and @observer
, make sure to apply them in the correct order: observer
should be the inner decorator, inject
the outer. There might be additional decorators in between. - The original component wrapped by
inject
is available as the wrappedComponent
property of created the higher order component.
Inject as function
The above example in ES5 would start like:
var Button = inject("color")(observer(React.createClass({
})))
Strongly typing inject
inject
also accepts a function ((allStores, nextProps, nextContext) => nextProps
) that can be used to pick all the desired stores from the available stores like this:
import {IUserStore} from "myStore"
@inject((allStores) => ({
userStore: allStores.userStore as IUserStore
}))
class MyComponent extends React.Component<{ userStore?: IUserStore; otherProp: number }, {}> {
}
Make sure to mark userStore
as optional property. It should not (necessarily) be passed in by parent components after all!
FAQ
Should I use observer
for each component?
You should use observer
on every component that displays observable data.
Even the small ones. observer
allows components to render independently from their parent and in general this means that
the more you use observer
, the better the performance become.
The overhead of observer
itself is neglectable.
See also Do child components need @observer
?
I see React warnings about forceUpdate
/ setState
from React
The following warning will appear if you trigger a re-rendering between instantiating and rendering a component:
Warning: forceUpdate(...): Cannot update during an existing state transition (such as within `render`). Render methods should be a pure function of props and state.`
-- or --
Warning: setState(...): Cannot update during an existing state transition (such as within `render` or another component's constructor). Render methods should be a pure function of props and state; constructor side-effects are an anti-pattern, but can be moved to `componentWillMount`.
Usually this means that (another) component is trying to modify observables used by this components in their constructor
or getInitialState
methods.
This violates the React Lifecycle, componentWillMount
should be used instead if state needs to be modified before mounting.
Internal DevTools Api
trackComponents()
Enables the tracking from components. Each rendered reactive component will be added to the componentByNodeRegistery
and its renderings will be reported through the renderReporter
event emitter.
renderReporter
Event emitter that reports render timings and component destructions. Only available after invoking trackComponents()
.
New listeners can be added through renderReporter.on(function(data) { /* */ })
.
Data will have one of the following formats:
{
event: 'render',
renderTime: ,
totalTime: ,
component: ,
node:
}
{
event: 'destroy',
component: ,
node:
}
componentByNodeRegistery
WeakMap. Its get
function returns the associated reactive component of the given node. The node needs to be precisely the root node of the component.
This map is only available after invoking trackComponents
.