Web-ext
This is a command line tool to help build, run, and test
WebExtensions.
Ultimately, it aims to support browser extensions in a standard, portable,
cross-platform way. Initially, it will provide a streamlined experience for developing
Firefox Extensions.
Documentation
Here are the commands you can run. Click on each one for detailed documentation or use --help
on the command line, such as web-ext build --help
.
run
lint
- Validate the extension source
sign
- Sign the extension so it can be installed in Firefox
build
- Create an extension package from source
docs
- Open the
web-ext
documentation in a browser
Installation from npm
First, make sure you are running the current
LTS
(long term support) version of
NodeJS.
Global command
You can install this command onto your machine globally with:
npm install --global web-ext
For your project
Alternatively, you can install this command as one of the
devDependencies
of your project. This method can help you control the version of web-ext
as used by your team.
npm install --save-dev web-ext
Next you can use the web-ext
command in your project as an
npm script.
Here is an example where the --source-dir
argument specifies where to find
the source code for your extension.
package.json
"scripts": {
"start:firefox": "web-ext run --source-dir ./extension-dist/",
}
You can always pass in additional commands to your npm scripts using
the --
suffix. For example, the previous script could specify the Firefox
version on the command line with this:
npm run start:firefox -- --firefox=nightly
Installation from source
You'll need:
- Node.js, 6.0.0 or higher
- npm, 3.0.0 or higher is recommended
Optionally, you may like:
- nvm, which helps manage node versions
If you had already installed web-ext
from npm,
you may need to uninstall it first:
npm uninstall --global web-ext
Change into the source and install all dependencies:
git clone https://github.com/mozilla/web-ext.git
cd web-ext
npm install
Build the command:
npm run build
Link it to your node installation:
npm link
You can now run it from any directory:
web-ext --help
To get updates, just pull changes and rebuild the executable. You don't
need to relink it.
cd /path/to/web-ext
git pull
npm run build
Using web-ext in NodeJS code
Aside from using web-ext on the command line, you may wish to execute web-ext
in NodeJS code. There is limited support for this. Here are some examples.
You are able to execute command functions without any argument validation. If you want to execute web-ext run
you would do so like this:
import webExt from 'web-ext';
webExt.cmd.run({
firefox: '/path/to/Firefox-executable',
sourceDir: '/path/to/your/extension/source/',
}, {
shouldExitProgram: false,
})
.then((extensionRunner) => {
console.log(extensionRunner);
});
If you would like to control logging, you can access the logger object. Here is an example of turning on verbose logging:
webExt.util.logger.consoleStream.makeVerbose();
webExt.cmd.run({sourceDir: './src'}, {shouldExitProgram: false});
You can also disable the use of standard input:
webExt.cmd.run({noInput: true}, {shouldExitProgram: false});
web-ext
is designed for WebExtensions but you can try disabling manifest validation to work with legacy extensions. This is not officially supported.
webExt.cmd.run(
{sourceDir: './src'},
{
getValidatedManifest: () => ({
name: 'some-fake-name',
version: '1.0.0',
}),
shouldExitProgram: false,
},
);
Should I Use It?
Yes! The web-ext tool enables you to build and ship extensions for Firefox.
This platform stabilized in
Firefox 48
which was released in April of 2016.
Get Involved
Hi! This tool is under active development. To get involved you can watch the repo,
file issues, create pull requests, or ask a question on
dev-addons.
Read the contributing section for how to develop new features.
Some Questions and Answers
Why do we need a command line tool?
This is a great question and one that we will ask ourselves for each new web-ext
feature. Most WebExtension functionality is baked into the browsers
themselves but a complimentary command line tool will still be helpful.
Here is a partial list of examples:
- File watching.
- When you edit a file, you may need to trigger certain commands (tests,
installation, etc).
- Integrating with services.
- Mozilla offers some useful services such as
linting and
signing
extensions.
Why not patch jpm for WebExtensions support?
First, note that jpm is still
actively maintained by Mozilla right now.
We decided not to patch jpm for WebExtensions support (See
jpm issue 445,
discussion).
Mozilla built cfx
then deprecated it for jpm and now we're proposing a new tool.
I know this is frustrating for developers, but WebExtensions mark a major
turning point. It would be an arduous task to wedge its feature set and
simplified development process into jpm.
Pros of creating a new tool:
- By creating a new tool that focuses on the [emerging] WebExtensions standard,
we have a better chance of interoperating with other platforms, such as
Google Chrome or
Opera.
It would be hard to do that while preserving compatibility in jpm.
- Creating SDK-based add-ons was overly complicated. With WebExtensions you no
longer need to convert your source into legacy artifacts and you won't need
boostrapping scripts.
- There are superior features in Firefox now for developing extensions such
as loading
from source code instead of a packaged XPI. It will be
easier to reimagine a new tool around these work flows rather than
adjust jpm's existing work flows.
- jpm's functional tests are slow, brittle and hard to run. There are flaky
time-outs and we've run out of low hanging fruit fixes at this point.
- Most of jpm's code was not designed to be unit testable which makes it hard to
maintain and refactor.
- jpm's code was written in ES5 which is cumbersome after coming from the ES6
Firefox code base or from most other languages with modern conveniences
(Python, Ruby, etc).
- Some core functionality of jpm can be extracted and re-used in the new tool.
Cons of creating a new tool:
- Firefox extension developers will have to interrupt and re-arrange their work flows.
- Developers of existing add-ons will need to port to WebExtensions sooner rather than later.
- The web-ext tool will require some ramp-up time for scaffolding.
- The community of jpm contributors will need to shift focus to web-ext.