✨ABracadabra✨ is a Python framework consisting of statistical tools and a convenient API specialized for running hypothesis tests on observational experiments (aka “AB Tests” in the tech world). The framework has driven Quizlet’s experimentation pipeline since 2018.
| Variable Type | Model Class | inference_method parameter |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous | Frequentist | 'means_delta' (t-test) |
| Bayesian | 'gaussian', 'student_t', 'exp_student_t' | |
| Binary / Proportions | Frequentist | 'proportions_delta' (z-test) |
| Bayesian | 'binomial', 'beta_binomial', 'bernoulli' | |
| Counts/Rates | Frequentist | 'rates_ratio' |
| Bayesian | 'gamma_poisson' | |
| Non-parametric | Bootstrap | 'bootstrap' |
python>=3.7.pippip install abracadabra
pip install git+https://github.com/quizlet/abracadabra.git
If you would like to contribute to ✨ABracadabra✨, then you'll probably want to install from source (or use the -e flag when installing from PyPI):
mkdir /PATH/TO/LOCAL/ABRACABARA && cd /PATH/TO/LOCAL/ABRACABARA
git clone git@github.com:quizlet/abracadabra.git
cd abracadabra
python setup.py develop
✨ABracadabra✨ takes as input a pandas DataFrame containing experiment observations data. Each record represents an observation/trial recorded in the experiment and has the following columns:
treatment columns: each treatment column contains two or more distinct, discrete values that are used to identify the different groups in the experimentmetric columns: these are the values associated with each observation that are used to compare groups in the experiment.attributes columns: these are associated with additional properties assigned to the observations. These attributes can be used for any additional segmentations across groups.To demonstrate, let's generate some artificial experiment observations data. The metric column in our dataset will be a series of binary outcomes (i.e. True/False, here stored as float values). This binary metric is analogous to conversion or success in AB testing. These outcomes are simulated from three different Bernoulli distributions, each associated with the treatements named "A", "B", and "C". and each of which has an increasing average probability of conversion, respectively. The simulated data also contains four attribute columns, named attr_*.
from abra.utils import generate_fake_observations
# generate demo data
experiment_observations = generate_fake_observations(
distribution='bernoulli',
n_treatments=3,
n_attributes=4,
n_observations=120
)
experiment_observations.head()
"""
id treatment attr_0 attr_1 attr_2 attr_3 metric
0 0 C A0a A1a A2a A3a 1.0
1 1 B A0b A1a A2a A3a 1.0
2 2 C A0c A1a A2a A3a 1.0
3 3 C A0c A1a A2a A3a 0.0
4 4 A A0b A1a A2a A3a 1.0
"""
The three key components of running an AB test are:
Experiment, which references the observations recorded during experiment (described above) and any optional metadata associated with the experiment.HypothesisTest, which defines the hypothesis and statistical inference method applied to the experiment data.HypothesisTestResults, which is the statistical artifact that results from running a HypothesisTest against an Experiment's observations. The HypothesisTestResults are used to summarize, visualize, and interpret the inference results and make decisions based on these results.Thus running an hypothesiss test in ✨ABracadabra✨ follows the basic 123 pattern:
Experiment with observations and (optionally) any associated metadata.HypothesisTest. This requires defining the hypothesis and a relevant inference_method, which will depend on the support of your observations.HypothesisTestResultsWe now demonstrate how to run and analyze a hypothesis test on the artificial observations data generated above. Since this simulated experiment focuses on a binary metric we'll want our HypothesisTest to use an inference_method that supports binary variables. The "proportions_delta" inference method, which tests for a significant difference in average probability between two different samples of probabilities is a valid test for our needs. Here our probabilities equal either 0 or 1, but the sample averages will likely be equal to some intermediate value. This is analogous to AB tests that aim to compare conversion rates between a control and a variation group.
In addition to the inference_method, we also want to establish the hypothesis we want to test. In other words, if we find a significant difference in conversion rates, do we expect one group to be larger or smaller than the other. In this test we'll test that the variation group "C"has a "larger" average conversion rate than the control group "A".
Below we show how to run such a test in ✨ABracadabra✨.
# Running an AB Test is as easy as 1, 2, 3
from abra import Experiment, HypothesisTest
# 1. Initialize the `Experiment`
# We (optionally) name the experiment "Demo"
exp = Experiment(data=experiment_observations, name='Demo')
# 2. Define the `HypothesisTest`
# Here, we test that the variation "C" is "larger" than the control "A",
# based on the values of the "metric" column, using a Frequentist z-test,
# as parameterized by `inference_method="proportions_delta"`
ab_test = HypothesisTest(
metric='metric',
treatment='treatment',
control='A', variation='C',
inference_method='proportions_delta',
hypothesis='larger'
)
# 3. Run and interpret the `HypothesisTestResults`
# Here, we run our HypothesisTest with an assumed
# Type I error rate of alpha=0.05
ab_test_results = exp.run_test(ab_test, alpha=.05)
assert ab_test_results.accept_hypothesis
# Display results
ab_test_results.display()
"""
Observations Summary:
+----------------+------------------+------------------+
| Treatment | A | C |
+----------------+------------------+------------------+
| Metric | metric | metric |
| Observations | 35 | 44 |
| Mean | 0.4286 | 0.7500 |
| Standard Error | (0.2646, 0.5925) | (0.6221, 0.8779) |
| Variance | 0.2449 | 0.1875 |
+----------------+------------------+------------------+
Test Results:
+---------------------------+---------------------+
| ProportionsDelta | 0.3214 |
| ProportionsDelta CI | (0.1473, inf) |
| CI %-tiles | (0.0500, inf) |
| ProportionsDelta-relative | 75.00 % |
| CI-relative | (34.37, inf) % |
| Effect Size | 0.6967 |
| alpha | 0.0500 |
| Power | 0.9238 |
| Inference Method | 'proportions_delta' |
| Test Statistic ('z') | 3.4671 |
| p-value | 0.0003 |
| Degrees of Freedom | None |
| Hypothesis | 'C is larger' |
| Accept Hypothesis | True |
| MC Correction | None |
| Warnings | None |
+---------------------------+---------------------+
"""
# Visualize Frequentist Test results
ab_test_results.visualize()
We see that the Hypothesis test declares that the variation 'C is larger' (than the control "A") showing a 43% relative increase in conversion rate, and a moderate effect size of 0.38. This results in a p-value of 0.028, which is lower than the prescribed $\alpha=0.05$.
If your samples do not follow standard parametric distributions (e.g. Gaussian, Binomial, Poisson), or if you're comparing more exotic descriptive statistics (e.g. median, mode, etc) then you might want to consider using a non-parametric Bootstrap Hypothesis Test. Running bootstrap tests is easy in ✨abracadabra✨, you simply use the "bootstrap" inference_method.
# Tests and data can be copied via the `.copy` method.
bootstrap_ab_test = ab_test.copy(inference_method='bootstrap')
# Run the Bootstrap test
bootstrap_ab_test_results = exp.run_test(bootstrap_ab_test)
# Display results
bootstrap_ab_test_results.display()
"""
Observations Summary:
+----------------+------------------+------------------+
| Treatment | A | C |
+----------------+------------------+------------------+
| Metric | metric | metric |
| Observations | 35 | 44 |
| Mean | 0.4286 | 0.7500 |
| Standard Error | (0.2646, 0.5925) | (0.6221, 0.8779) |
| Variance | 0.2449 | 0.1875 |
+----------------+------------------+------------------+
Test Results:
+-----------------------------------------+-------------------+
| BootstrapDelta | 0.3285 |
| BootstrapDelta CI | (0.1497, 0.5039) |
| CI %-tiles | (0.0500, inf) |
| BootstrapDelta-relative | 76.65 % |
| CI-relative | (34.94, 117.58) % |
| Effect Size | 0.7121 |
| alpha | 0.0500 |
| Power | 0.8950 |
| Inference Method | 'bootstrap' |
| Test Statistic ('bootstrap-mean-delta') | 0.3285 |
| p-value | 0.0020 |
| Degrees of Freedom | None |
| Hypothesis | 'C is larger' |
| Accept Hypothesis | True |
| MC Correction | None |
| Warnings | None |
+-----------------------------------------+-------------------+
"""
## Visualize Bayesian AB test results, including samples from the model
bootstrap_ab_test_results.visualize()
Notice that the "bootstrap" hypothesis test results above--which are based on resampling the data set with replacent--are very similar to the results returned by the "proportions_delta" parametric model, which are based on descriptive statistics and model the data set as a Binomial distribution. The results will converge as the sample sizes grow.
Running Bayesian AB Tests is just as easy as running a Frequentist test, simply change the inference_method of the HypothesisTest. Here we run Bayesian hypothesis test that is analogous to "proportions_delta" used above for conversion rates. The Bayesian test is based on the Beta-Binomial model, and thus called with the argument inference_method="beta_binomial".
# Copy the parameters of the original HypothesisTest,
# but update the `inference_method`
bayesian_ab_test = ab_test.copy(inference_method='beta_binomial')
bayesian_ab_test_results = exp.run_test(bayesian_ab_test)
assert bayesian_ab_test_results.accept_hypothesis
# Display results
bayesian_ab_test_results.display()
"""
Observations Summary:
+----------------+------------------+------------------+
| Treatment | A | C |
+----------------+------------------+------------------+
| Metric | metric | metric |
| Observations | 35 | 44 |
| Mean | 0.4286 | 0.7500 |
| Standard Error | (0.2646, 0.5925) | (0.6221, 0.8779) |
| Variance | 0.2449 | 0.1875 |
+----------------+------------------+------------------+
Test Results:
+----------------------+-------------------------------+
| Delta | 0.3028 |
| HDI | (0.0965, 0.5041) |
| HDI %-tiles | (0.0500, 0.9500) |
| Delta-relative | 76.23 % |
| HDI-relative | (7.12, 152.56) % |
| Effect Size | 0.6628 |
| alpha | 0.0500 |
| Credible Mass | 0.9500 |
| p(C > A) | 0.9978 |
| Inference Method | 'beta_binomial' |
| Model Hyperarameters | {'alpha_': 1.0, 'beta_': 1.0} |
| Inference Method | 'sample' |
| Hypothesis | 'C is larger' |
| Accept Hypothesis | True |
| Warnings | None |
+----------------------+-------------------------------+
"""
# Visualize Bayesian AB test results, including samples from the model
bayesian_ab_test_results.visualize()
Above we see that the Bayesian hypothesis test provides similar results to the Frequentist test, indicating a 45% relative lift in conversion rate when comparing "C" to "A". Rather than providing p-values that are used to accept or reject a Null hypothesis, the Bayesian tests provides directly-interpretable probability estimates p(C > A) = 0.95, here indicating that there is 95% chance that the variation "C" is larger than the control "A".
FAQs
Making hypothesis and AB testing magically simple!
We found that abracadabra demonstrated a healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released less than a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Research
Security News
Attackers used a malicious npm package typosquatting a popular ESLint plugin to steal sensitive data, execute commands, and exploit developer systems.
Security News
The Ultralytics' PyPI Package was compromised four times in one weekend through GitHub Actions cache poisoning and failure to rotate previously compromised API tokens.
Security News
Research
Socket researchers found a malicious Maven package impersonating the legitimate ‘XZ for Java’ library, introducing a backdoor for remote code execution.