pip-compile-cross-platform

pip-compile-cross-platform

Pin your Python dependencies as you would with pip-compile, except in a cross-platform way.

Usage

1. pip install --user pip-compile-cross-platform
2. pip-compile-cross-platform requirements.in

What is "pinning"?

"Pinning" your Python dependencies makes them predictable and deterministic by resolving all transitive dependencies (dependencies of dependencies) and hard-coding them up-front.

For example, you can define a requirements.in file with the top-level requirements that you have:

requests==2.27.1

Then, you run pip-compile-cross-platform, which produces a requirements.txt file with the "pinned" packages:

certifi==2022.5.18.1 ; python_full_version >= "3.6.0" \
    --hash=sha256:f1d53542ee8cbedbe2118b5686372fb33c297fcd6379b050cca0ef13a597382a \
    --hash=sha256:9c5705e395cd70084351dd8ad5c41e65655e08ce46f2ec9cf6c2c08390f71eb7
charset-normalizer==2.0.12 ; python_full_version >= "3.6.0" \
    --hash=sha256:2857e29ff0d34db842cd7ca3230549d1a697f96ee6d3fb071cfa6c7393832597 \
    --hash=sha256:6881edbebdb17b39b4eaaa821b438bf6eddffb4468cf344f09f89def34a8b1df
idna==3.3 ; python_full_version >= "3.6.0" \
    --hash=sha256:84d9dd047ffa80596e0f246e2eab0b391788b0503584e8945f2368256d2735ff \
    --hash=sha256:9d643ff0a55b762d5cdb124b8eaa99c66322e2157b69160bc32796e824360e6d
requests==2.27.1 \
    --hash=sha256:f22fa1e554c9ddfd16e6e41ac79759e17be9e492b3587efa038054674760e72d \
    --hash=sha256:68d7c56fd5a8999887728ef304a6d12edc7be74f1cfa47714fc8b414525c9a61
urllib3==1.26.9 ; python_version >= "2.7" and python_full_version < "3.0.0" or python_full_version >= "3.6.0" and python_version < "4" \
    --hash=sha256:44ece4d53fb1706f667c9bd1c648f5469a2ec925fcf3a776667042d645472c14 \
    --hash=sha256:aabaf16477806a5e1dd19aa41f8c2b7950dd3c746362d7e3223dbe6de6ac448e

Now, when developers install dependencies into their environment, they use the requirements.txt file: pip install -r requirements.txt.

Since they're using this "lockfile" rather than the simpler requirements.in, they're guaranteed to have the exact same packages installed as everyone else working on your project. This sidesteps a major cause of "works on my machine, but for some reason not on yours" issues that aren't fun to diagnose 😎

How does this compare to pip-compile?

pip-compile is an incredible tool built by the Jazzband crew that pins dependencies exactly as described above. It can comfortably be described as a primary solution to the "pinning" problem in the Python ecosystem over the last half-decade. In summary: pip-compile is great :)

However, there's one main limitation: cross-environment usage is unsupported. This means that conditional dependencies (such as Windows-only dependencies like colorama, or backport libraries like iso8601 which are only needed for Python < 3.7) aren't properly captured by pip-compile.

pip-compile recommends creating a separate requirements.txt for each environment, but this can lead to a lot of requirements-$python-version-$os.txt files:

lockfiles
requirements-3.7-windows.txt
requirements-3.7-linux.txt
requirements-3.7-macos.txt
requirements-3.8-windows.txt
...

This has a few downsides:

• Developers have to consider which requirements-...txt file to install, and if the wrong one is chosen, the error message (pip complaining about missing hashes) doesn't make the root cause clear.
• Generating lockfiles requires many operating system environments, which can be a hassle to set up. There's a GitHub Actions workflow template that can be used to lower this cost, but it's still a time-consuming (and perhaps eventually expensive) solution.
  • There's a minor, but possible other concern: there's a race condition where a new version of a transitive dependency is published in between lockfiles being created, causing different requirements...txt files to have different versions of the same package.

pip-compile-cross-platform sidesteps these downsides by generating a single requirements.txt lockfile that is valid for all environments.

Usage compared to pip-compile

pip-compile-cross-platform is planned to be compatible with the same command-line usage as pip-compile. However, many flags and options are missing so far, so help to improve this compatibility would be much appreciated.

How it works under-the-hood

Environment-specific dependencies are defined using environment markers. pip-compile evaluates environment markers up-front according to the current environment, which is why packages not needed for the lockfile-generating machine are dropped. pip-compile-cross-platform "carries forward" the environment markers into the created lockfile, which is why it is able to work in all environments.

How pip-compile-cross-platform is able to do this is by leveraging the fantastic poetry tool. poetry is a "dependency management" tool for Python projects, whose main downside is that it requires that all developers/environments working with a project have poetry installed. This isn't a large cost, but it still carries migration risk, which is (my theory about) why many projects still use pip-compile today instead.

So, part of poetry's core logic requires carefully resolving dependencies and keeping track of environment markers. pip-compile-cross-platform wraps around this logic, feeding in your project's top-level requirements and extracting out a pip-compatible requirements.txt file.

---

The best way to visualize pip-compile-cross-platform is that it's a thin wrapper around poetry that mimicks the interface of pip-compile: this allows projects that still use pip-compile to get the benefits of poetry without having to make a significant time investment.