github.com/fluued/fasthttp
Fast HTTP implementation for Go.
fasthttp was designed for some high performance edge cases. Unless your server/client needs to handle thousands of small to medium requests per second and needs a consistent low millisecond response time fasthttp might not be for you. For most cases net/http is much better as it's easier to use and can handle more cases. For most cases you won't even notice the performance difference.
Currently fasthttp is successfully used by VertaMedia in a production serving up to 200K rps from more than 1.5M concurrent keep-alive connections per physical server.
TechEmpower Benchmark round 19 results
Switching from net/http to fasthttp
In short, fasthttp server is up to 10 times faster than net/http. Below are benchmark results.
GOMAXPROCS=1
net/http server:
$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go test -bench=NetHTTPServerGet -benchmem -benchtime=10s
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet1ReqPerConn 1000000 12052 ns/op 2297 B/op 29 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet2ReqPerConn 1000000 12278 ns/op 2327 B/op 24 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10ReqPerConn 2000000 8903 ns/op 2112 B/op 19 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10KReqPerConn 2000000 8451 ns/op 2058 B/op 18 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet1ReqPerConn10KClients 500000 26733 ns/op 3229 B/op 29 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet2ReqPerConn10KClients 1000000 23351 ns/op 3211 B/op 24 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10ReqPerConn10KClients 1000000 13390 ns/op 2483 B/op 19 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet100ReqPerConn10KClients 1000000 13484 ns/op 2171 B/op 18 allocs/op
fasthttp server:
$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go test -bench=kServerGet -benchmem -benchtime=10s
BenchmarkServerGet1ReqPerConn 10000000 1559 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet2ReqPerConn 10000000 1248 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10ReqPerConn 20000000 797 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10KReqPerConn 20000000 716 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet1ReqPerConn10KClients 10000000 1974 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet2ReqPerConn10KClients 10000000 1352 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10ReqPerConn10KClients 20000000 789 ns/op 2 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet100ReqPerConn10KClients 20000000 604 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
GOMAXPROCS=4
net/http server:
$ GOMAXPROCS=4 go test -bench=NetHTTPServerGet -benchmem -benchtime=10s
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet1ReqPerConn-4 3000000 4529 ns/op 2389 B/op 29 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet2ReqPerConn-4 5000000 3896 ns/op 2418 B/op 24 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10ReqPerConn-4 5000000 3145 ns/op 2160 B/op 19 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10KReqPerConn-4 5000000 3054 ns/op 2065 B/op 18 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet1ReqPerConn10KClients-4 1000000 10321 ns/op 3710 B/op 30 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet2ReqPerConn10KClients-4 2000000 7556 ns/op 3296 B/op 24 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet10ReqPerConn10KClients-4 5000000 3905 ns/op 2349 B/op 19 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPServerGet100ReqPerConn10KClients-4 5000000 3435 ns/op 2130 B/op 18 allocs/op
fasthttp server:
$ GOMAXPROCS=4 go test -bench=kServerGet -benchmem -benchtime=10s
BenchmarkServerGet1ReqPerConn-4 10000000 1141 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet2ReqPerConn-4 20000000 707 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10ReqPerConn-4 30000000 341 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10KReqPerConn-4 50000000 310 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet1ReqPerConn10KClients-4 10000000 1119 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet2ReqPerConn10KClients-4 20000000 644 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet10ReqPerConn10KClients-4 30000000 346 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkServerGet100ReqPerConn10KClients-4 50000000 282 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
In short, fasthttp client is up to 10 times faster than net/http. Below are benchmark results.
GOMAXPROCS=1
net/http client:
$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go test -bench='HTTPClient(Do|GetEndToEnd)' -benchmem -benchtime=10s
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientDoFastServer 1000000 12567 ns/op 2616 B/op 35 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd1TCP 200000 67030 ns/op 5028 B/op 56 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd10TCP 300000 51098 ns/op 5031 B/op 56 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd100TCP 300000 45096 ns/op 5026 B/op 55 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd1Inmemory 500000 24779 ns/op 5035 B/op 57 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd10Inmemory 1000000 26425 ns/op 5035 B/op 57 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd100Inmemory 500000 28515 ns/op 5045 B/op 57 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd1000Inmemory 500000 39511 ns/op 5096 B/op 56 allocs/op
fasthttp client:
$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go test -bench='kClient(Do|GetEndToEnd)' -benchmem -benchtime=10s
BenchmarkClientDoFastServer 20000000 865 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd1TCP 1000000 18711 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd10TCP 1000000 14664 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd100TCP 1000000 14043 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd1Inmemory 5000000 3965 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd10Inmemory 3000000 4060 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd100Inmemory 5000000 3396 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd1000Inmemory 5000000 3306 ns/op 2 B/op 0 allocs/op
GOMAXPROCS=4
net/http client:
$ GOMAXPROCS=4 go test -bench='HTTPClient(Do|GetEndToEnd)' -benchmem -benchtime=10s
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientDoFastServer-4 2000000 8774 ns/op 2619 B/op 35 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd1TCP-4 500000 22951 ns/op 5047 B/op 56 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd10TCP-4 1000000 19182 ns/op 5037 B/op 55 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd100TCP-4 1000000 16535 ns/op 5031 B/op 55 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd1Inmemory-4 1000000 14495 ns/op 5038 B/op 56 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd10Inmemory-4 1000000 10237 ns/op 5034 B/op 56 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd100Inmemory-4 1000000 10125 ns/op 5045 B/op 56 allocs/op
BenchmarkNetHTTPClientGetEndToEnd1000Inmemory-4 1000000 11132 ns/op 5136 B/op 56 allocs/op
fasthttp client:
$ GOMAXPROCS=4 go test -bench='kClient(Do|GetEndToEnd)' -benchmem -benchtime=10s
BenchmarkClientDoFastServer-4 50000000 397 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd1TCP-4 2000000 7388 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd10TCP-4 2000000 6689 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd100TCP-4 3000000 4927 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd1Inmemory-4 10000000 1604 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd10Inmemory-4 10000000 1458 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd100Inmemory-4 10000000 1329 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkClientGetEndToEnd1000Inmemory-4 10000000 1316 ns/op 5 B/op 0 allocs/op
go get -u github.com/valyala/fasthttp
Unfortunately, fasthttp doesn't provide API identical to net/http. See the FAQ for details. There is net/http -> fasthttp handler converter, but it is better to write fasthttp request handlers by hand in order to use all of the fasthttp advantages (especially high performance :) ).
Important points:
Fasthttp works with RequestHandler functions instead of objects implementing Handler interface. Fortunately, it is easy to pass bound struct methods to fasthttp:
type MyHandler struct {
foobar string
}
// request handler in net/http style, i.e. method bound to MyHandler struct.
func (h *MyHandler) HandleFastHTTP(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) {
// notice that we may access MyHandler properties here - see h.foobar.
fmt.Fprintf(ctx, "Hello, world! Requested path is %q. Foobar is %q",
ctx.Path(), h.foobar)
}
// request handler in fasthttp style, i.e. just plain function.
func fastHTTPHandler(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) {
fmt.Fprintf(ctx, "Hi there! RequestURI is %q", ctx.RequestURI())
}
// pass bound struct method to fasthttp
myHandler := &MyHandler{
foobar: "foobar",
}
fasthttp.ListenAndServe(":8080", myHandler.HandleFastHTTP)
// pass plain function to fasthttp
fasthttp.ListenAndServe(":8081", fastHTTPHandler)
The RequestHandler accepts only one argument - RequestCtx. It contains all the functionality required for http request processing and response writing. Below is an example of a simple request handler conversion from net/http to fasthttp.
// net/http request handler
requestHandler := func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
switch r.URL.Path {
case "/foo":
fooHandler(w, r)
case "/bar":
barHandler(w, r)
default:
http.Error(w, "Unsupported path", http.StatusNotFound)
}
}
// the corresponding fasthttp request handler
requestHandler := func(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) {
switch string(ctx.Path()) {
case "/foo":
fooHandler(ctx)
case "/bar":
barHandler(ctx)
default:
ctx.Error("Unsupported path", fasthttp.StatusNotFound)
}
}
Fasthttp allows setting response headers and writing response body in an arbitrary order. There is no 'headers first, then body' restriction like in net/http. The following code is valid for fasthttp:
requestHandler := func(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) {
// set some headers and status code first
ctx.SetContentType("foo/bar")
ctx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusOK)
// then write the first part of body
fmt.Fprintf(ctx, "this is the first part of body\n")
// then set more headers
ctx.Response.Header.Set("Foo-Bar", "baz")
// then write more body
fmt.Fprintf(ctx, "this is the second part of body\n")
// then override already written body
ctx.SetBody([]byte("this is completely new body contents"))
// then update status code
ctx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusNotFound)
// basically, anything may be updated many times before
// returning from RequestHandler.
//
// Unlike net/http fasthttp doesn't put response to the wire until
// returning from RequestHandler.
}
Fasthttp doesn't provide ServeMux, but there are more powerful third-party routers and web frameworks with fasthttp support:
Net/http code with simple ServeMux is trivially converted to fasthttp code:
// net/http code
m := &http.ServeMux{}
m.HandleFunc("/foo", fooHandlerFunc)
m.HandleFunc("/bar", barHandlerFunc)
m.Handle("/baz", bazHandler)
http.ListenAndServe(":80", m)
// the corresponding fasthttp code
m := func(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) {
switch string(ctx.Path()) {
case "/foo":
fooHandlerFunc(ctx)
case "/bar":
barHandlerFunc(ctx)
case "/baz":
bazHandler.HandlerFunc(ctx)
default:
ctx.Error("not found", fasthttp.StatusNotFound)
}
}
fasthttp.ListenAndServe(":80", m)
Because creating a new channel for every request is just too expensive, so the channel returned by RequestCtx.Done() is only closed when the server is shutting down.
func main() {
fasthttp.ListenAndServe(":8080", fasthttp.TimeoutHandler(func(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) {
select {
case <-ctx.Done():
// ctx.Done() is only closed when the server is shutting down.
log.Println("context cancelled")
return
case <-time.After(10 * time.Second):
log.Println("process finished ok")
}
}, time.Second*2, "timeout"))
}
net/http -> fasthttp conversion table:
var (
w http.ResponseWriter
r *http.Request
ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx
)
VERY IMPORTANT! Fasthttp disallows holding references to RequestCtx or to its' members after returning from RequestHandler. Otherwise data races are inevitable. Carefully inspect all the net/http request handlers converted to fasthttp whether they retain references to RequestCtx or to its' members after returning. RequestCtx provides the following band aids for this case:
Use this brilliant tool - race detector - for detecting and eliminating data races in your program. If you detected data race related to fasthttp in your program, then there is high probability you forgot calling TimeoutError before returning from RequestHandler.
Blind switching from net/http to fasthttp won't give you performance boost. While fasthttp is optimized for speed, its' performance may be easily saturated by slow RequestHandler. So profile and optimize your code after switching to fasthttp. For instance, use quicktemplate instead of html/template.
See also fasthttputil, fasthttpadaptor and expvarhandler.
[]byte buffers - just reuse them as much
as possible. Fasthttp API design encourages this.go tool pprof --alloc_objects your-program mem.pprof usually gives better
insights for optimization opportunities than go tool pprof your-program cpu.pprof.[]byte and string, since this may result in memory
allocation+copy. Fasthttp API provides functions for both []byte and string -
use these functions instead of converting manually between []byte and string.
There are some exceptions - see this wiki page
for more details.[]byte buffersThe following tricks are used by fasthttp. Use them in your code too.
var (
// both buffers are uninitialized
dst []byte
src []byte
)
dst = append(dst, src...) // is legal if dst is nil and/or src is nil
copy(dst, src) // is legal if dst is nil and/or src is nil
(string(src) == "") // is true if src is nil
(len(src) == 0) // is true if src is nil
src = src[:0] // works like a charm with nil src
// this for loop doesn't panic if src is nil
for i, ch := range src {
doSomething(i, ch)
}
So throw away nil checks for []byte buffers from you code. For example,
srcLen := 0
if src != nil {
srcLen = len(src)
}
becomes
srcLen := len(src)
[]byte buffer with appenddst = append(dst, "foobar"...)
[]byte buffer may be extended to its' capacity.buf := make([]byte, 100)
a := buf[:10] // len(a) == 10, cap(a) == 100.
b := a[:100] // is valid, since cap(a) == 100.
[]byte bufferstatusCode, body, err := fasthttp.Get(nil, "http://google.com/")
uintBuf := fasthttp.AppendUint(nil, 1234)
[]byte buffers may converted without memory allocationsfunc b2s(b []byte) string {
return *(*string)(unsafe.Pointer(&b))
}
func s2b(s string) (b []byte) {
bh := (*reflect.SliceHeader)(unsafe.Pointer(&b))
sh := (*reflect.StringHeader)(unsafe.Pointer(&s))
bh.Data = sh.Data
bh.Cap = sh.Len
bh.Len = sh.Len
return b
}
This is an unsafe way, the result string and []byte buffer share the same bytes.
Please make sure not to modify the bytes in the []byte buffer if the string still survives!
Why creating yet another http package instead of optimizing net/http?
Because net/http API limits many optimization opportunities. For example:
map[string][]string. So the server
must parse all the headers, convert them from []byte to string and put
them into the map before calling user-provided request handler.
This all requires unnecessary memory allocations avoided by fasthttp.Why fasthttp API is incompatible with net/http?
Because net/http API limits many optimization opportunities. See the answer above for more details. Also certain net/http API parts are suboptimal for use:
Why fasthttp doesn't support HTTP/2.0 and WebSockets?
HTTP/2.0 support is in progress. WebSockets has been done already. Third parties also may use RequestCtx.Hijack for implementing these goodies.
Are there known net/http advantages comparing to fasthttp?
Yes:
Why fasthttp API prefers returning []byte instead of string?
Because []byte to string conversion isn't free - it requires memory
allocation and copy. Feel free wrapping returned []byte result into
string() if you prefer working with strings instead of byte slices.
But be aware that this has non-zero overhead.
Which GO versions are supported by fasthttp?
Go 1.15.x. Older versions won't be supported.
Please provide real benchmark data and server information
See this issue.
Are there plans to add request routing to fasthttp?
There are no plans to add request routing into fasthttp. Use third-party routers and web frameworks with fasthttp support:
See also this issue for more info.
I detected data race in fasthttp!
Cool! File a bug. But before doing this check the following in your code:
I didn't find an answer for my question here
Try exploring these questions.
FAQs
Unknown package
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
Research
The Socket Research Team breaks down a malicious wrapper package that uses obfuscation to harvest credentials and exfiltrate sensitive data.
Research
Security News
Attackers used a malicious npm package typosquatting a popular ESLint plugin to steal sensitive data, execute commands, and exploit developer systems.
Security News
The Ultralytics' PyPI Package was compromised four times in one weekend through GitHub Actions cache poisoning and failure to rotate previously compromised API tokens.