Custom Modules for Typedoc
By default, Typedoc (with the mode="modules"
option) will create a Module (née "External Module") for every file with any exported ES6 constructs. This can result in an unmanageable amount of globals, poor discoverability, and difficult navigation. This plugin enables the grouping of these modules by a particular name.
This plugin supports two additional comment tags:
@moduledefinition ModuleName
can be placed at the top of a file that best represents a "module" for your codebase. This will create a ModuleName
module in the top-level project hierarchy.@module ModuleName
can be added to the comment of any other valid exported Typescript declaration (e.g. a class, interface, function, enum etc). These declarations will be moved to any modules specified with @moduledefinition
. Any orphaned modules (e.g. a file that exports a @module
-tagged class and nothing else) are deleted.
Additionally, all exported TS constructs not explicitly tagged with @module
are automatically unwrapped from the default "module" (which is just the file in which it is defined) and placed directly beneath the project. This should be identical to using Typedoc with mode="file"
.
See the test/multiple-ancestor-modules
directory for a typical use case for this plugin.
Requires typedoc 0.16.0 (yet unreleased)! This is currently built on top of Typedoc PR #801, which enables the support of export declarations.
Inspired by the popular typedoc-plugin-external-module-name, but with a slightly different set of requirements. This plugin leverages some improved TypeDoc comment APIs to support spaces within module names.
Caveats
- The comment containing a
@moduledefinition
must be the FIRST thing in a file. E.g. no import
statements above it, no header license comments, etc.
TODO
Potential future enhancements:
- Support per-file
@module
tags as well. Individual export @module
s would override any file @module
s - Nested modules with a
@parent
tag or something - Support automatic creation of modules (such that a
@moduledefinition
isn't required for every potential @module
)