@stendahls/libravatar-server
Advanced tools
A node implementation of the Libravatar API
$ npx @stendahls/libravatar-server
Without npx
npm i @stendahls/libravatar-server --only=production
./node_modules/.bin/libravatar-server
Create a .env file in the folder you start the server from
LISTEN_PORT
default: 4000
allowed values: Kinda whatever you want
DEFAULT_SIZE
default: 80
allowed values: 1 - 512
PROVIDER
default: file
allowed values: file elvis
There might also be some specific options for some providers
Loads avatars from a folder.
The folder should contain jpg images where the name of the file should be the email you
want the avatar to be for. my.email@example.com.jpg
FILE_PROVIDER_RAW_FOLDER
default: ./raw
allowed values: Any path
Loads avatars from a "container" in Elvis DAM
ELVIS_PROVIDER_SERVER
Full url to Elvis server
ELVIS_PROVIDER_USER
Username to log in with
ELVIS_PROVIDER_PASSWORD
Password for the user to login with
ELVIS_PROVIDER_AVATAR_CONTAINER
What container-id to look for avatars in
ELVIS_PROVIDER_AVATAR_DOMAIN
Domain for the avatars found in Elvis, such as example.com
FAQs
A node implementation of the Libravatar API
We found that @stendahls/libravatar-server demonstrated a not healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released a year ago. It has 5 open source maintainers collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
Research
Socket researchers have discovered malicious npm packages targeting crypto developers, stealing credentials and wallet data using spyware delivered through typosquats of popular cryptographic libraries.
Security News
Socket's package search now displays weekly downloads for npm packages, helping developers quickly assess popularity and make more informed decisions.
Security News
A Stanford study reveals 9.5% of engineers contribute almost nothing, costing tech $90B annually, with remote work fueling the rise of "ghost engineers."