crio
Immutable JS objects with a natural API
Jump to the API
API Documentation
Upgrade notice
If upgrading from 3.x.x
versions, please check the changelog for breaking changes.
Import into your project
import crio from 'crio';
const crio = require('crio');
const crio = window.crio;
Usage
const crioArray = crio(['foo']);
const crioObject = crio({foo: 'bar'});
const otherCrioArray = crio.array(['bar']);
const otherCrioObject = crio.object({bar: 'baz'});
What is immutable?
When something is described as immutable, it means that it cannot change after it has been created. In JavaScript terms, this means that any attempted change to an object results in a brand new object being created, without changing the original object.
Why do we need this in JavaScript?
The concept of immutability already exists in a lot of places in JavaScript, for example:
const two = 2;
const three = 3;
const five = two + three;
By adding together two and three you expect to get five, however you don't expect the value of two to change. You can continue working with it even after using it in an expression:
const two = 2;
const three = 3;
const five = two + three;
const four = two * two;
This is true of strings, numbers, undefined, and null, and is an expected behavior. The same idea, however, is not true for complex objects in JavaScript. For example:
const foo = ['foo'];
const fooBar = foo.push('bar');
The expectation is that you have pushed the value of "bar" into foo and created a new array bar that contains "foo, bar", however in reality this is what happens:
const foo = ['foo'];
const fooBar = foo.push('bar');
console.log(foo);
console.log(fooBar);
Basically, you have mutated foo so that it is no longer empty, and what the .push() method returns is actually the index of the item you just added. This double-standard of expectations creates a lot confusion from a development perspective, but also makes keeping track of the state of your application very difficult because there is no traceability of what transactions have occurred to create that state at any given point.
Enter crio
crio attempts to solve the problem by closing the "immutable loop" on collection items, meaning it applies immutability to objects that are normally mutable by nature by replacing mutating methods with immutable counterparts. As a point of reference:
Naturally immutable objects
- Numbers
- Strings
- undefined
- null
Naturally mutable objects
- Arrays
- Dates (not covered by crio)
- Objects
To create a new crio object, its pretty straightforward:
const crioArray = crio([]);
const crioObject = crio({});
These are examples with empty objects, but you can pass in populated objects as well, or if you pass in nothing it will default to an object. What crio does is clone and freeze the object via Object.freeze, and stores as a custom CrioArray
or CrioObject
with a prototypical methods that will return a new immutable version of the object with each update. Example:
const foo = crio(['foo']);
const fooBar = foo.push('bar');
console.log(foo);
console.log(fooBar);
The API is the same as you already know working with those objects, and includes polyfills for all ES6 and some ES7 functions, as well as a few helpful crio-specific functions. The only difference is that any setting happens via .set() rather than direct index / property setting. You can work with the objects as you normally would with other libraries (lodash, for example). There is also no change to the protoypes of native objects, so you can apply this on your existing code go-forward. Basically, you shouldn't even notice you aren't working with the native objects, save for the fact everything is immutable.
Why not just use X immutable library?
There are a bunch of ones out there, but the two that people usually gravitate towards:
immutable
is quite nice, and very highly regarded by the community, however it creates an opaque object that cannot be used with other external libraries (namely lodash) without converting back to vanilla JS. Additionally, the object itself is not truly immutable, just constructed in a way that makes it incredibly difficult to alter outside of the API. This decision was likely made for performance reasons, but can cause unintended consequences (you can totally assign foo.bar = 'baz'
and no error is thrown).
seamless-immutable
has some great ideas, and I thought that could be the best option because they try to retain the native operations while leveraging Object.freeze, much like crio does. That said, they do not try to replace mutable methods with immutable ones, they just throw errors when you attempt them and its up to you to figure out the "right way". As such, it fell short of my expectations.
Bottom line, I support each of these projects to the fullest because they are trying to instill immutability in JavaScript practices; I just took a different approach that I consider the best of both worlds. :)
Browser support
The only requirement is that your browser has a proper ES5 environment, which you can mostly shim with something like es5-shim, however certain things like Object.defineProperty cannot be shimmed, so IE8 and below cannot be supported.
crio has been tested on the following browsers:
Performance
As of 4.0.0
, performance has substantially improved, and in many scenarios crio
is more performant than seamless-immutable
(in the case of setIn
, by over 5x). When it comes to get
operations (either directly or nested), crio
is identical to native in performance. See the benchmark results if you want to see performance in node, or spin up the app locally if you want to see the performance in the browser.
Gotchas
Recursive objects are not allowed
Immutable objects with recursive values are basically impossible, and trying them will cause a stack overflow, so be mindful of that!
Development
Standard stuff, clone the repo and npm install
dependencies. The npm scripts available:
benchmark
=> run benchmarks in nodebenchmark:watch
=> run benchmark
with persistent watcher for changesbuild
=> run webpack to build crio.js with NODE_ENV=developmentbuild:minifed
=> run webpack to build crio.min.js with NODE_ENV=productioncompile-for-publish
=> run lint
, test
, transpile
, dist
dev
=> run webpack dev server to run example app (playground!)dev:production
=> runs dev
but with NODE_ENV=productiondist
=> runs build
and build-minified
lint
=> run ESLint against all files in the src
folderprepublish
=> runs compile-for-publish
test
=> run AVA test functions with NODE_ENV=test
test:watch
=> same as test
, but runs persistent watchertranspile
=> run babel against all files in src
to create files in lib