Is a simple view library for creating components with Template Literals. Components are converted to Hyper Script which creates the virtual dom. The virtual dom has a diffing mechanism similar to ReactJS. This library is still in Alpha.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Literal JS Test</title>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/literaljs"></script>
<script src="index.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="app"></div>
</body>
</html>
Literal.Component(
`<p class="corn">
<div>
This is a div!
</div>
</p>`
);
Components just accept Template Literals and generate Hyper Script.
You can combine components with ${ }, like this:
var firstComponent = Literal.Component(
`<div>
This should render like React.
<p>Isn't this lovely?</p>
${otherComponent}
</div>`
);
var secondComponent = Literal.Component(
`<div>
Oh yeah!
</div>`
);
Literal.Render(MainComponent, 'app');
The Render method takes the last component and id of an html node in your entry file.
FAQs
A small JavaScript library for building reactive user interfaces.
The npm package literaljs receives a total of 6 weekly downloads. As such, literaljs popularity was classified as not popular.
We found that literaljs demonstrated a not healthy version release cadence and project activity because the last version was released a year ago. It has 1 open source maintainer collaborating on the project.
Did you know?
Socket for GitHub automatically highlights issues in each pull request and monitors the health of all your open source dependencies. Discover the contents of your packages and block harmful activity before you install or update your dependencies.
Security News
Research
Socket researchers have discovered malicious npm packages targeting crypto developers, stealing credentials and wallet data using spyware delivered through typosquats of popular cryptographic libraries.
Security News
Socket's package search now displays weekly downloads for npm packages, helping developers quickly assess popularity and make more informed decisions.
Security News
A Stanford study reveals 9.5% of engineers contribute almost nothing, costing tech $90B annually, with remote work fueling the rise of "ghost engineers."