Live demo
Chat
Rationale
react
/react-dom
comes with 2 basic assumptions/ideas:
- every UI is hierarchical naturally. This why we have the idea of "
components
wrap each other" react-dom
mounts (physically) child component to its parent DOM node by default
The problem is that sometimes the second property isn't what you want in your case. Sometimes you want to mount your component into different physical DOM node and hold logical connection between parent and child at the same time.
Canonical example is a Tooltip-like component: at some point, during development process, you could find that you need to add some description for your UI element
: it'll be rendered in some fixed layer and it should know its coordinates (which are corresponding UI element
coord or mouse coords) and at the same time it needs information whether it should be shown right now or not, its content and some context from parent components. Sometimes logical hierarchy isn't match with the physical DOM hierarchy and you have to go with additional efforts. You could find react-layer-stack
very helpful in these cases, for example:
import React, { Component } from 'react';
import { Layer, LayerToggle } from 'react-layer-stack';
import FixedLayer from './demo/components/FixedLayer';
class Demo extends Component {
render() {
return (
<div>
<Layer id="lightbox2">{ (_, content) =>
<FixedLayer style={ { marginRight: '15px', marginBottom: '15px' } }>
{ content }
</FixedLayer>
}</Layer>
<LayerToggle for="lightbox2">{({ show, hide }) => (
<button onMouseLeave={ hide } onMouseMove={ ({ pageX, pageY }) => {
show(
<div style={{
left: pageX, top: pageY + 20, position: "absolute",
padding: '10px',
background: 'rgba(0,0,0,0.7)', color: '#fff', borderRadius: '5px',
boxShadow: '0px 0px 50px 0px rgba(0,0,0,0.60)'}}>
“There has to be message triage. If you say three things, you don’t say anything.”
</div>)
}}>Yet another button. Move your pointer to it.</button> )}
</LayerToggle>
</div>
)
}
}
Another option could be use one of dozens complete implementations with different properties:
https://js.coach/?search=popover
More examples
https://github.com/fckt/react-layer-stack/blob/master/demo/src/Demo.js
Live demo
https://fckt.github.io/react-layer-stack/
Installation
npm install --save react-layer-stack
API
3 components with a few properties.
<LayerStackMountPoint />
This is a mount point for Layer
s.
id: string
(optional) - you can have multiple LayerStackMountPoint
which could have different ID's
children: callback({ views, displaying, show: callback(id, args), hide, hideAll, mountPointId, mountPointArgs }): ReactElement
- you can choose different strategies how to render Layers
in LayerStackMountPoint
instead of the default one
<Layer />
id: string
- a Layer identificator. There could be only one layer with the same id
initialArgs
- initial arguments for a Layer
mountPointId
(optional) - the mount point to mount to
use: array
- array with context (closure) variables. Useful if you want to re-render the Layer if parent variables (closure) are changed
children: callback({ isActive, show: callback(args), showOnlyMe, hide, hideAll }, ...args): ReactElement
- will be rendered into
<LayerToggle />
LayerToggle
is a helper to have access for show/hide callbacks and the current state of the layer. There could be multiple LayerToggle
s for the same Layer
.
for: string
- a Layer identificator which LayerToggle corresponds to
children: callback({ isActive, show: callback(args), showOnlyMe, hide, hideAll }): ReactElement
- will be mounted (rendered) directly to its parent
Store layers in your redux store
react-layer-stack
provides reducer
(import { reducer } from 'react-layer-stack'
) which you can combine into your Redux store instead of using preconfigured LayerStackProvider
. This is useful if you want to store everything in one store (which is a good practice).
Real-world usage example
Public API consist 2 key components: Layer
, LayerStackMountPoint
and 1 additional: LayerToggle
(sometimes toggle needs to know which popover is open now).
Set the LayerStackMountPoint
somewhere on the top of the tree:
import { LayerStackProvider, LayerStackMountPoint } from 'react-layer-stack'
return (
<LayerStackProvider>
<Container>
<LayerStackMountPoint />
<AppBar />
<Container className={styles.container}>
{children}
</Container>
</Container>
</LayerStackProvider>
)
Define your Layer
. This example shows how to propagate variables from lexical context (https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Closures) to the Layer
, which will be displayed in the LayerStackMountPoint
. Each layer should have an id
and use
properties. use
property is needed to determine if we should update the lexical context of the anonymous function which renders Modal
into Layer
if Cell
is re-rendered.
import { Layer, LayerToggle } from 'react-layer-stack'
const modalId = 'DeleteObjectConfirmation' + objects[rowIndex].id
return (
<Cell {...props}>
// the layer definition. The content will show up in the LayerStackMountPoint when `show(modalId)` be fired in LayerToggle
<Layer use={[objects[rowIndex], rowIndex]} id={modalId}> {({
hide, // alias for `hide(modalId)`
index } // useful to know to set zIndex, for example
, e) => // access to the arguments (click event data in this example)
<Modal onClick={ hide } zIndex={(index + 1) * 1000}>
<ConfirmationDialog
title={ 'Delete' }
message={ "You're about to delete to " + '"' + objects[rowIndex].name + '"' }
confirmButton={ <Button type="primary">DELETE</Button> }
onConfirm={ this.handleDeleteObject.bind(this, objects[rowIndex].name, hide) } // hide after confirmation
close={ hide } />
</Modal> }
</Layer>
// this is the toggle for Layer with `id === modalId` can be defined everywhere in the components tree
<LayerToggle for={ modalId }> {({show}) => // show is alias for `show(modalId)`
<div style={styles.iconOverlay} onClick={ (e) => show(e) }> // additional arguments can be passed (like event)
<Icon type="trash" />
</div> }
</LayerToggle>
</Cell>)
ReactDOM.unstable_createPortal
Facebook team is working on the similar feature called "portals" (by analogy with https://github.com/tajo/react-portal). That approach uses ReactDOM
(API) which is fatal if browser is not the only target. There are other considerations also.
Alternatives
The is a lot of alternative ways to archive the desirable bottom-to-up link b/w components.
The most obvious (and naiive as well) way is to use redux (or another flux/data lib) as a transport to send data from one DOM branch to another. It's good and robust solution (moreover react-layer-stack use redux as a store currently), but the problem is that it feels like overkill. It seems not universal also, could consume some additional time to implement and grasp afterwards, not because of complications, but because you have to reinvent the same pattern again and again (slightly different in each case, see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35623656/how-can-i-display-a-modal-dialog-in-redux-that-performs-asynchronous-actions).
Another solution is to use on of ready-to-use components. But sometimes are you need slightly different behavior/look and more productive to implement home-grown ad-hock solution.
And the last option is to find library like https://github.com/tajo/react-portal or https://react-bootstrap.github.io/react-overlays/, designed to address the needs of bottom-to-up communication. These libs are often quite opinionated to their cases and doesn't solve the problem in its roots. The goal of react-layer-stack is to give an answer how to organize bottom-to-up communication in the most natural, reasonable and flexible way.
The future
Obviously there is a lot of applications for the Layer API (https://github.com/fckt/react-layer-stack/blob/master/README.md#layer-). So, you can declare the entire React app as a Layer and manage it from the outer app!
Images to understand the whole thing
View layers stack
Layer id and "use" property (sym/soft link)
Related Stackoverflow q&a
The easiest way to support react-layer-stack
is to upvote the answers below.