h1. Acl9
Acl9 is yet another solution for role-based authorization in Rails. It consists of two
subsystems which can be used separately.
Role control subsystem allows you to set and query user roles for various objects.
Access control subsystem allows you to specify different role-based access rules
inside controllers.
A bunch of access rules is translated into a complex
boolean expression. Then it's turned into a lambda or a method and can
be used with @before_filter@. Thus you can block unprivileged access to certain
actions of your controller.
An example:
class VerySecretController < ApplicationController
access_control do
allow :superadmin
allow :owner, :of => :secret
action :index do
allow anonymous, logged_in
end
allow logged_in, :to => :show
allow :manager, :of => :secret, :except => [:delete, :destroy]
deny :thiefs
end
def index
# ...
end
# ...
end
h1. Changes
This version of Acl9 by rurounijones has been modified from the original (be9's version).
The main changes are to remove the HABTM relationship between the subject and the role. Now
the relationship is a has_many, this is to allow for has_many :through relationships to be
setup.
This means that the number of records in the role table will be much higher than the original.
Apart from that there are no other changes and the API remains the same.
h1. Contacts
The original Acl9 is hosted "on the GitHub":http://github.com/be9/acl9.
This version of Acl9 is also hosted "on the Github":http://github.com/rurounijones/acl9.
You may find tutorials and additional docs on the "wiki page":http://wiki.github.com/be9/acl9.
Rdocs are available "here":http://rdoc.info/projects/be9/acl9.
If you have questions regarding the original Acl9, please post to the
"acl9-discuss group":http://groups.google.com/group/acl9-discuss
h1. Installation
This version of Acl9 can be installed as a gem from "GitHub":http://github.com.
Add the following line to your @config/environment.rb@:
config.gem "rurounijones-acl9", :source => "http://gems.github.com", :lib => "acl9"
Then run @rake gems:install@ (with possible @rake gems:unpack@ thereafter) and you're done!
Alternatively you can install Acl9 as a plugin:
script/plugin install git://github.com/be9/acl9.git
h1. Basics
h2. Authorization is not authentication!
Both words start with "auth" but have different meaning!
Authentication is basically a mapping of credentials (username, password) or
OpenID to specific user account in the system.
Authorization is an authenticated user's permission to perform some
specific action somewhere in the system.
Acl9 is a authorization solution, so you will need to implement authentication
by other means. I recommend "Authlogic":http://github.com/binarylogic/authlogic
for that purpose, as it's simple, clean and at the same time very configurable.
h2. Roles
Role is an abstraction. You could directly assign permissions to user accounts in
your system, but you'd not want to! Way more manageable solution is to assign permissions
to roles and roles further to users.
For example, you can have role called admin which has all available permissions. Now
you may assign this role to several trusted accounts on your system.
Acl9 also supports the notion of object roles, that is, roles with limited scope.
Imagine we are building a magazine site and want to develop a permission system. So, what roles
and permissions are there?
Journalists should be able to create articles in their section and edit their own articles.
Section editors should be able to edit and delete all articles in their sections and
change the published flag.
Editor-in-chief should be able to change everything.
We clearly see that journalists and section editors are tied to a specific section, whereas
editor-in-chief is a role with global scope.
h2. Role interface
All permission checks in Acl9 are boiled down to calls of a single method:
@subject.has_role?(role, object)@
That should be read as "Does subject have role on object?".
Subject is an instance of a @User@, or @Account@, or whatever model you use for
authentication. Object is an instance of any class (including subject class!)
or @nil@ (in which case it's a global role).
Acl9 builtin role control subsystem provides @has_role?@ method for you, but you can
also implemented it by hand (see Coming up with your own role implementation below).
h1. Acl9 role control subsystem
Role control subsystem has been lifted from
"Rails authorization plugin":http://github.com/DocSavage/rails-authorization-plugin,
but undergone some modifications.
It's based on two tables in the database. First, role table, which stores pairs @[role_name, object]@
where object is a polymorphic model instance or a class. Second, join table, which joins users and roles.
To use this subsystem, you should define a @Role@ model.
h2. Role model
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authorization_role
end
The structure of @roles@ table is as follows:
create_table "roles", :force => true do |t|
t.integer "user_id", # Change if your subject is not user
t.string "name", :limit => 40
t.string "authorizable_type", :limit => 40
t.integer "authorizable_id"
t.datetime "created_at"
t.datetime "updated_at"
end
Note that you will almost never use the @Role@ class directly.
h2. Subject model
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authorization_subject
end
h2. Object model
Place @acts_as_authorization_object@ call inside any model you want to act
as such.
class Foo < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authorization_object
end
class Bar < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authorization_object
end
h2. Interface
h3. Subject model
A call of @acts_as_authorization_subject@ defines following methods on the model:
@subject.has_role?(role, object = nil)@. Returns @true@ of @false@ (has or has not).
@subject.has_role!(role, object = nil)@. Assigns a @role@ for the @object@ to the @subject@.
Does nothing is subject already has such a role.
@subject.has_no_role!(role, object = nil)@. Unassigns a role from the @subject@.
@subject.has_roles_for?(object)@. Does the @subject@ has any roles for @object@? (@true@ of @false@)
@subject.has_role_for?(object)@. Same as @has_roles_for?@.
@subject.roles_for(object)@. Returns an array of @Role@ instances, corresponding to @subject@ 's roles on
@object@. E.g. @subject.roles_for(object).map(&:name).sort@ will give you role names in alphabetical order.
@subject.has_no_roles_for!(object)@. Unassign any @subject@ 's roles for a given @object@.
@subject.has_no_roles!@. Unassign all roles from @subject@.
h3. Object model
A call of @acts_as_authorization_object@ defines following methods on the model:
@object.accepts_role?(role_name, subject)@. An alias for @subject.has_role?(role_name, object)@.
@object.accepts_role!(role_name, subject)@. An alias for @subject.has_role!(role_name, object)@.
@object.accepts_no_role!(role_name, subject)@. An alias for @subject.has_no_role!(role_name, object)@.
@object.accepts_roles_by?(subject)@. An alias for @subject.has_roles_for?(object)@.
@object.accepts_role_by?(subject)@. Same as @accepts_roles_by?@.
@object.accepts_roles_by(subject)@. An alias for @subject.roles_for(object)@.
h2. Custom class names
You may want to deviate from default @User@ and @Role@ class names. That can easily be done with
arguments to @acts_as_...@.
Say, you have @Account@ and @AccountRole@:
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authorization_subject :role_class_name => 'AccountRole'
end
class AccountRole < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authorization_role :subject_class_name => 'Account'
end
class FooBar < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authorization_object :role_class_name => 'AccountRole', :subject_class_name => 'Account'
end
Or... since Acl9 defaults can be changed in a special hash, you can put the following snippet:
Acl9::config.merge!({
:default_role_class_name => 'AccountRole',
:default_subject_class_name => 'Account',
})
... into @config/initializers/acl9.rb@ and get rid of that clunky arguments:
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authorization_subject
end
class AccountRole < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authorization_role
end
class FooBar < ActiveRecord::Base
acts_as_authorization_object
end
Note that you'll need to change your database structure appropriately:
create_table "account_roles", :force => true do |t|
t.string "name", :limit => 40
t.string "authorizable_type", :limit => 40
t.integer "authorizable_id"
t.datetime "created_at"
t.datetime "updated_at"
end
create_table "account_roles_accounts", :id => false, :force => true do |t|
t.integer "account_id"
t.integer "account_role_id"
t.datetime "created_at"
t.datetime "updated_at"
end
h2. Examples
user = User.create!
user.has_role? 'admin' # => false
user.has_role! :admin
user.has_role? :admin # => true
@user@ now has global role admin. Note that you can specify role name either
as a string or as a symbol.
foo = Foo.create!
user.has_role? 'admin', foo # => false
user.has_role! :manager, foo
user.has_role? :manager, foo # => true
foo.accepts_role? :manager, user # => true
user.has_roles_for? foo # => true
You can see here that global and object roles are distinguished from each other. User
with global role admin isn't automatically admin of @foo@.
However,
user.has_role? :manager # => true
That is, if you have an object role, it means that you have a global role with the same name too!
In other words, you are manager if you manage at least one @foo@ (or a @bar@...).
bar = Bar.create!
user.has_role! :manager, bar
user.has_no_role! :manager, foo
user.has_role? :manager, foo # => false
user.has_role? :manager # => true
Our @user@ is no more manager of @foo@, but has become a manager of @bar@.
user.has_no_roles!
user.has_role? :manager # => false
user.has_role? :admin # => false
user.roles # => []
At this time @user@ has no roles in the system.
h2. Coming up with your own role implementation
The described role system with its 2 tables (not counting the @users@ table!)
might be an overkill for many cases. If all you want is global roles without
any scope, you'd better off implementing it by hand.
The access control subsystem of Acl9 uses only @subject.has_role?@ method, so
there's no need to implement anything else except for own convenience.
For example, if each your user can have only one global role, just add @role@
column to your @User@ class:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
def has_role?(role_name, obj=nil)
self.role == role_name
end
def has_role!(role_name, obj=nil)
self.role = role_name
save!
end
end
If you need to assign multiple roles to your users, you can use @serialize@
with role array or a special solution like
"preference_fu":http://github.com/brennandunn/preference_fu.
h1. Access control subsystem
By means of access control subsystem you can protect actions of your controller
from unauthorized access. Acl9 provides a nice DSL for writing access rules.
h2. Allow and deny
Access control is mostly about allowing and denying. So there are two
basic methods: @allow@ and @deny@. They have the same syntax:
allow ROLE_LIST, OPTIONS
deny ROLE_LIST, OPTIONS
h3. Specifying roles
ROLE_LIST is a list of roles (at least 1 role should be there). So,
allow :manager, :admin
deny :banned
will match holders of global role manager and holders of global role admin as allowed.
On the contrary, holders of banned role will match as denied.
Basically this snippet is equivalent to
allow :manager
allow :admin
deny :banned
which means that roles in argument list are OR'ed for a match, and not AND'ed.
Also note that:
- You may use both strings and :symbols to specify roles (the latter get converted into strings).
- Role names are singularized before check.
Thus the snippet above can also be written as
allow :managers, :admins
deny 'banned'
or even
allow *%w(managers admins)
deny 'banned'
h3. Object and class roles
Examples in the previous section were all about global roles. Let's see how we can
use object and class roles in the ACL block.
allow :responsible, :for => Widget
allow :possessor, :of => :foo
deny :angry, :at => :me
allow :interested, :in => Future
deny :short, :on => :time
deny :hated, :by => :us
To specify an object you use one of the 6 preposition options:
They all have the same meaning, use one that makes better English out of your rule.
Now, each of these prepositions may point to a Class or a :symbol. In the former case we get
a class role. E.g. @allow :responsible, :for => Widget@ becomes @subject.has_role?('responsible', Widget)@.
Symbol is trickier, it means that the appropriate instance variable of the controller is taken
as an object.
@allow :possessor, :of => :foo@ is translated into
subject.has_role?('possessor', controller.instance_variable_get('@foo'))
.
Checking against an instance variable has sense when you have another before filter which is executed
before the one generated by @access_control@, like this:
class MoorblesController < ApplicationController
before_filter :load_moorble, :only => [:edit, :update, :destroy]
access_control do
allow :creator, :of => :moorble
# ...
end
# ...
private
def load_moorble
@moorble = Moorble.find(params[:id])
end
end
Note that the object option is applied to all of the roles you specify in the argument list.
As such,
allow :devil, :son, :of => God
is equivalent to
allow :devil, :of => God
allow :son, :of => God
but NOT
allow :devil
allow :son, :of => God
h3. Pseudo-roles
There are three pseudo-roles in the ACL: @all@, @anonymous@ and @logged_in@.
@allow all@ will always match (as well as @deny all@).
@allow anonymous@ and @deny anonymous@ will match when user is anonymous, i.e. subject is @nil@.
You may also use a shorter notation: @allow nil@ (@deny nil@).
@logged_in@ is direct opposite of @anonymous@, so @allow logged_in@ will match if the user is logged in
(subject is not @nil@).
No role checks are done in either case.
h3. Limiting action scope
By default rules apply to all actions of the controller. There are two options that
narrow the scope of the @deny@ or @allow@ rule: @:to@ and @:except@.
allow :owner, :of => :site, :to => [:delete, :destroy]
deny anonymous, :except => [:index, :show]
For the first rule to match not only the current user should be an owner of the site, but also
current action should be delete or destroy.
In the second rule anonymous user access is denied for all actions, except index and show.
You may not specify both @:to@ and @:except@.
Note that you can use actions block instead of @:to@ (see Actions block
below). You can also use @:only@ and @:except@ options in the
@access_control@ call which will serve as options of the @before_filter@ and thus
limit the scope of the whole ACL.
h3. Rule conditions
You may create conditional rules using @:if@ and @:unless@ options.
allow :owner, :of => :site, :to => [:delete, :destroy], :if => :chance_to_delete
Controller's @:chance_to_delete@ method will be called here. The rule will match if the action
is 'delete' or 'destroy' AND if the method returned @true@.
@:unless@ has the opposite meaning and should return @false@ for a rule to match.
Both options can be specified in the same rule.
allow :visitor, :to => [:index, :show], :if => :right_phase_of_the_moon?, :unless => :suspicious?
@right_phase_of_the_moon?@ should return @true@ AND @suspicious?@ should return @false@ for a poor visitor to
see a page.
Currently only controller methods are supported (specify them as :symbols). Lambdas are not supported.
h2. Rule matching order
Rule matching system is similar to that of Apache web server. There are two modes: default allow
(corresponding to @Order Deny,Allow@ in Apache) and default deny (@Order Allow,Deny@ in Apache).
h3. Setting modes
Mode is set with a @default@ call.
@default :allow@ will set default allow mode.
@default :deny@ will set default deny mode. Note that this is the default mode, i.e. it will be on
if you don't do a @default@ call at all.
h3. Matching algorithm
First of all, regardless of the mode, all @allow@ matches are OR'ed together and all @deny@ matches
are OR'ed as well.
We'll express this in the following manner:
ALLOWED = (allow rule 1 matches?) OR ((allow rule 2 matches?) OR ...
NOT_DENIED = NOT ((deny rule 1 matches?) OR (deny rule 2 matches?) OR ...)
So, ALLOWED is @true@ when either of the @allow@ rules matches, and NOT_DENIED is @true@ when none
of the @deny@ rules matches.
Let's denote the final result of algorithm as ALLOWANCE. If it's @true@, access is allowed, if @false@ - denied.
In the case of default allow:
ALLOWANCE = ALLOWED OR NOT_DENIED
In the case of default deny:
ALLOWANCE = ALLOWED AND NOT_DENIED
Same result as a table:
|. Rule matches |. Default allow mode |_. Default deny mode |
| None of the @allow@ and @deny@ rules matched. | Access is allowed. | Access is denied. |
| Some of the @allow@ rules matched, none of the @deny@ rules matched. | Access is allowed. | Access is allowed. |
| None of the @allow@ rules matched, some of the @deny@ rules matched. | Access is denied. | Access is denied. |
| Some of the @allow@ rules matched, some of the @deny@ rules matched. | Access is allowed. | Access is denied. |
Apparently default deny mode is more strict, and that's because it's on by default.
h2. Actions block
You may group rules with the help of the @actions@ block.
An example from the imaginary @PostsController@:
allow :admin
actions :index, :show do
allow all
end
actions :new, :create do
allow :managers, :of => Post
end
actions :edit, :update do
allow :owner, :of => :post
end
action :destroy do
allow :owner, :of => :post
end
This is equivalent to:
allow :admin
allow all, :to => [:index, :show]
allow :managers, :of => Post, :to => [:new, :create]
allow :owner, :of => :post, :to => [:edit, :update]
allow :owner, :of => :post, :to => :destroy
Note that only @allow@ and @deny@ calls are available inside @actions@ block, and these may not have
@:to@/@:except@ options.
@action@ is just a synonym for @actions@.
h2. access_control method
By calling @access_control@ in your controller you can get your ACL block translated into...
a lambda, installed with @before_filter@ and raising @Acl9::AccessDenied@ exception on occasion.
a method, installed with @before_filter@ and raising @Acl9::AccessDenied@ exception on occasion.
a method, returning @true@ or @false@, whether access is allowed or denied.
First case is by default. You can catch the exception with @rescue_from@ call and do something
you like: make a redirect, or render "Access denied" template, or whatever.
Second case is obtained with specifying method name as an argument to
@access_control@ (or using @:as_method@ option, see below) and may be helpful
if you want to use @skip_before_filter@ somewhere in the derived controller.
Third case will take place if you supply @:filter => false@ along with method
name. You'll get an ordinary method which you can call anywhere you want.
h3. :subject_method
Acl9 obtains the subject instance by calling specific method of the controller. By default it's
@:current_user@, but you may change it.
class MyController < ApplicationController
access_control :subject_method => :current_account do
allow :nifty
# ...
end
# ...
end
Subject method can also be changed globally. Place the following into @config/initializers/acl9.rb@:
Acl9::config[:default_subject_method] = :current_account
h3. :debug
@:debug => true@ will output the filtering expression into the debug log. If
Acl9 does something strange, you may look at it as the last resort.
h3. :as_method
In the case
class NiftyController < ApplicationController
access_control :as_method => :acl do
allow :nifty
# ...
end
# ...
end
access control checks will be added as @acl@ method onto MyController, with @before_filter :acl@ call thereafter.
Instead of using @:as_method@ you may specify the name of the method as a positional argument
to @access_control@:
class MyController < ApplicationController
access_control :acl do
# ...
end
# ...
end
h3. :filter
If you set @:filter@ to @false@ (it's @true@ by default) and also use
@:as_method@ (or method name as 1st argument to @access_control@, you'll get a
method which won't raise @Acl9::AccessDenied@ exception, but rather return
@true@ or @false@ (access allowed/denied).
class SecretController < ApplicationController
access_control :secret_access?, :filter => false do
allow :james_bond
# ...
end
def index
if secret_access?
_secret_index
else
_ordinary_index
end
end
# ...
private
def _secret_index
# ...
end
def _ordinary_index
# ...
end
end
The generated method can receive an objects hash as an argument. In this example,
class LolController < ApplicationController
access_control :lolcats?, :filter => false do
allow :cats, :by => :lol
# ...
end
end
you may not only call @lolcats?@ with no arguments, which will basically return
current_user.has_role?('cats', @lol)
but also as @lolcats?(:lol => Lol.find(params[:lol]))@. The hash will be looked into first,
even if you have an instance variable @lol@.
h3. :helper
Sometimes you want to have a boolean method (like @:filter => false@) accessible
in your views. Acl9 can call @helper_method@ for you:
class LolController < ApplicationController
access_control :helper => :lolcats? do
allow :cats, :by => :lol
# ...
end
end
That's equivalent to
class LolController < ApplicationController
access_control :lolcats?, :filter => false do
allow :cats, :by => :lol
# ...
end
helper_method :lolcats?
end
h3. Other options
Other options will be passed to @before_filter@. As such, you may use @:only@ and @:except@ to narrow
the action scope of the whole ACL block.
class OmgController < ApplicationController
access_control :only => [:index, :show] do
allow all
deny :banned
end
# ...
end
is basically equivalent to
class OmgController < ApplicationController
access_control do
actions :index, :show do
allow all
deny :banned
end
allow all, :except => [:index, :show]
end
# ...
end
h2. access_control in your helpers
Apart from using @:helper@ option for @access_control@ call inside controller, there's a
way to generate helper methods directly, like this:
module SettingsHelper
include Acl9Helpers
access_control :show_settings? do
allow :admin
allow :settings_manager
end
end
Here we mix in @Acl9Helpers@ module which brings in @access_control@ method and call it,
obtaining @show_settings?@ method.
An imaginary view:
<% if show_settings? %>
<%= link_to 'Settings', settings_path %>
<% end %>
Copyright (c) 2009 Oleg Dashevskii, released under the MIT license.